Search results for "Preference"
showing 10 items of 819 documents
NAUTILUS Navigator : free search interactive multiobjective optimization without trading-off
2019
We propose a novel combination of an interactive multiobjective navigation method and a trade-off free way of asking and presenting preference information. The NAUTILUS Navigator is a method that enables the decision maker (DM) to navigate in real time from an inferior solution to the most preferred solution by gaining in all objectives simultaneously as (s)he approaches the Pareto optimal front. This means that, while the DM reaches her/his most preferred solution, (s)he avoids anchoring around the starting solution and, at the same time, sees how the ranges of the reachable objective function values shrink without trading-off. The progress of the motion towards the Pareto optimal front is…
A new preference handling technique for interactive multiobjective optimization without trading-off
2015
Because the purpose of multiobjective optimization methods is to optimize conflicting objectives simultaneously, they mainly focus on Pareto optimal solutions, where improvement with respect to some objective is only possible by allowing some other objective(s) to impair. Bringing this idea into practice requires the decision maker to think in terms of trading-off, which may limit the ability of effective problem solving. We outline some drawbacks of this and exploit another idea emphasizing the possibility of simultaneous improvement of all objectives. Based on this idea, we propose a technique for handling decision maker’s preferences, which eliminates the necessity to think in terms of t…
Incorporating preference information in interactive reference point methods for multiobjective optimization
2009
In this paper, we introduce new ways of utilizing preference information specified by the decision maker in interactive reference point based methods. A reference point consists of desirable values for each objective function. The idea is to take the desires of the decision maker into account more closely when projecting the reference point onto the set of nondominated solutions. In this way we can support the decision maker in finding the most satisfactory solutions faster. In practice, we adjust the weights in the achievement scalarizing function that projects the reference point. We identify different cases depending on the amount of additional information available and demonstrate the c…
Prospect theory and stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA)
2009
Abstract We consider problems where multiple decision makers (DMs) want to choose their most preferred alternative from a finite set based on multiple criteria. Several approaches to support DMs in such problems have been suggested. Prospect theory has appealed to researchers through its descriptive power, but rare attempts have been made to apply it to support multicriteria decision making. The basic idea of prospect theory is that alternatives are evaluated by a difference function in terms of gains and losses with respect to a reference point. The function is suggested to be concave for gains and convex for losses and steeper for losses than for gains. Stochastic multicriteria acceptabil…
Solving the discrete multiple criteria problem using linear prospect theory
1994
Abstract Prospect theory developed by Kahneman and Tversky is a popular model of choice in decision problems under uncertainty. Prospect theory has recently been extended to multiple criteria choice problems. In this paper, an interactive method for solving discrete multiple criteria decision problems, based on prospect theory type value functions, has been developed. Piecewise linear marginal value functions are assumed to approximate the S-shaped value functions of prospect theory. Therefore, the proposed procedure is valid only for convex preferences.
Using box indices in supporting comparison in multiobjective optimization
2009
Because of the conflicting nature of criteria or objectives, solving a multiobjective optimization problem typically requires interaction with a decision maker who can specify preference information related to the objectives in the problem in question. Due to the difficulties of dealing with multiple objectives, the way information is presented plays a very important role. Questions posed to the decision maker must be simple enough and information shown must be easy to understand. For this purpose, visualization and graphical representations can be useful and constitute one of the main tools used in the literature. In this paper, we propose to use box indices to represent information relate…
Constrained Clusterwise Linear Regression
2005
In market segmentation, Conjoint Analysis is often used to estimate the importance of a product attributes at the level of each single customer, clustering, successively, the customers whose behavior can be considered similar. The preference model parameter estimation is made considering data (usually opinions) of a single customer at a time, but these data are usually very few as each customer is called to express his opinion about a small number of different products (in order to simplify his/her work). In the present paper a Constrained Clusterwise Linear Regression algorithm is presented, that allows simultaneously to estimate parameters and to cluster customers, using, for the estimati…
No-Preference Methods
1998
In no-preference methods, where the opinions of the decision maker are not taken into consideration, the multiobjective optimization problem is solved using some relatively simple method and the solution obtained is presented to the decision maker. The decision maker may either accept or reject the solution. It seems quite unlikely that the solution best satisfying the decision maker could be found with these methods. That is why no-preference methods are suitable for situations where the decision maker does not have any special expectations of the solution and (s)he is satisfied simply with some optimal solution. The working order here is: 1) analyst, 2) none.
An Interactive Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization Method: Interactive WASF-GA
2015
In this paper, we describe an interactive evolutionary algorithm called Interactive WASF-GA to solve multiobjective optimization problems. This algorithm is based on a preference-based evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithm called WASF-GA. In Interactive WASF-GA, a decision maker (DM) provides preference information at each iteration simple as a reference point consisting of desirable objective function values and the number of solutions to be compared. Using this information, the desired number of solutions are generated to represent the region of interest of the Pareto optimal front associated to the reference point given. Interactive WASF-GA implies a much lower computational…
Solving the Discrete Multiple Criteria Problem using Convex Cones
1984
An interactive method employing pairwise comparisons of attainable solutions is developed for solving the discrete, deterministic multiple criteria problem assuming a single decision maker who has an implicit quasi-concave increasing utility (or value) function. The method chooses an arbitrary set of positive multipliers to generate a proxy composite linear objective function which is then maximized over the set of solutions. The maximizing solution is compared with several solutions using pairwise judgments asked of the decision maker. Responses are used to eliminate alternatives using convex cones based on expressed preferences, and then a new set of weights is found that satisfies the i…