Search results for "Robotic surgery"

showing 10 items of 37 documents

Does conversion during minimally invasive rectal surgery for cancer have an impact on short-term and oncologic outcomes? Results of a retrospective c…

2021

International audience; Background: Although minimally invasive rectal surgery (MIRS) for cancer provides better recovery for similar oncologic outcomes over open approach, conversion is still required in 10% and its impact on short-term and long-term outcomes remains unclear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of conversion on postoperative and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing MIRS for cancer. Methods: From June 2011 to March 2020, we reviewed 257 minimally invasive rectal resections for cancer recorded in a prospectively maintained database, with 192 robotic and 65 laparoscopic approaches. Patients who required conversion to open (Conversion group) were compared to t…

Malemedicine.medical_specialtyColorectal cancermedicine.medical_treatmentPostoperative ComplicationsRobotic Surgical ProceduresMinimally invasive surgeryLaparotomymedicineHumansRobotic surgeryRectal cancerLaparoscopyRetrospective Studiesmedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryRectal NeoplasmsCancerRetrospective cohort studyConversionRobotic surgerymedicine.diseaseTotal mesorectal excisionSurgeryTreatment OutcomeSurgeryLaparoscopybusiness[SDV.MHEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathologyAbdominal surgerySurgical endoscopy
researchProduct

Robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection. Description of the surgical technique and analysis of early outcomes

2019

Abstract Background Despite the potential benefits, the adoption of the minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is still in the initial phase. We investigated the safety and feasibility of the robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy with venous resection/reconstruction (RPD SMV/PV). Methods Since March 2013 to October 2019, a total of 73 RPD and 10 RPD SMV/PV were performed. The two groups were case-matched according to the preoperative characteristics. Results Mean operative times and estimated blood loss were less in the RPD group in comparison to that in the RPD with SMV-PV group (525 vs 642 min, p = 0.003 and 290 vs 620 ml, p = 0.002, respectively…

Malemedicine.medical_specialtyRobotic assistedmedicine.medical_treatmentOperative TimeAdenocarcinoma030230 surgeryPancreaticoduodenectomy03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineRobotic Surgical ProceduresBorderline resectablePancreatic cancerVascular reconstructionHumansMedicineRobotic surgeryVascular resectionAgedbusiness.industryMortality rateSurgical outcomesRobotic surgeryMiddle Agedmedicine.diseasePancreaticoduodenectomySurgeryPancreatic NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeOncology030220 oncology & carcinogenesisInitial phaseFemaleSurgerybusinessVascular Surgical Procedures
researchProduct

Robotic surgery can be safely performed for patients and healthcare workers during COVID‐19 pandemic

2021

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the safety of robotic surgery during COVID-19 pandemic concerning new-acquired COVID-19 infections for patients and healthcare workers. PATIENTS: We performed a retrospective single-centre cohort study of patients undergoing robotic surgery in initial period of COVID-19 pandemic. Patients and Healthcare workers COVID-19 infection status was assessed by structured telephone follow-up and/or repeated nasopharyngeal swabs. RESULTS: After 61 robotic surgeries (93,5% cancer surgery), 1 patient (1.6%) had COVID-19 infection. 60 healthcare workers cumulatively exposed to 1,187 hours of robotic surgery had no infection. One patient with postoperative proof of SARS-CoV-2 h…

Malesafetymedicine.medical_specialtyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Health Personnel610 MedizincoronavirusBiophysicsSARS‐CoV‐203 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineRobotic Surgical Procedures610 Medical sciencesHealth carePandemicmedicineHumansRobotic surgery030212 general & internal medicineElective surgeryPandemicsAgedRetrospective StudiesroboticsSARS-CoV-2business.industryCOVID-19Robotic Surgical ProceduresRetrospective cohort studyMiddle AgedinfectionComputer Science Applicationsbody regions030220 oncology & carcinogenesisEmergency medicineFemaleOriginal ArticleSurgerybusiness2019‐nCoVCohort studyThe International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
researchProduct

Conversion to Open Surgery During Minimally Invasive Right Colectomy for Cancer: Results from a Large Multinational European Study

2023

: Background: The risk of conversion to open surgery is inevitably present during any minimally invasive colorectal surgical procedure. Conversions have been associated with adverse postoperative and oncologic outcomes. No previous study has evaluated the specific causes and consequences of conversion during a minimally invasive right colectomy (MIS-RC). Materials and Methods: We analyzed the Minimally invasivE surgery for oncologic Right ColectomY (MERCY) study database including patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic RC because of colon cancer between 2014 and 2020. Descriptive analyses were performed to determine the different reasons for conversion. Uni- and multivariate logisti…

Minimally InvasivE surgerycolon cancerright colectomyrobotic surgerylaparoscopySurgeryconversion
researchProduct

Role of robotic surgery in ovarian malignancy

2017

As part of minimally invasive surgery, robotic-assisted approach is becoming increasingly popular in gynecologic oncology. It has been shown to be effective and feasible for staging and treating endometrial and cervical cancer, but its role in the context of primary and recurrent ovarian cancers is presently debated. Scanty data are available in the literature, and the level of evidence supporting its use in ovarian cancer is quite low. However, from a retrospective case-control series, robotic surgery seems to be safe and feasible for early-stage ovarian cancer. Its use in treating patients with advanced-stage or relapsed ovarian cancer is still highly controversial, suggesting the choice …

Oncologymedicine.medical_specialtyPopulationContext (language use)robotic surgery ovarian cancerGynecologic oncologygynecologic oncology03 medical and health sciencesGynecologic Surgical Procedures0302 clinical medicineRobotic Surgical ProceduresInternal medicinerobotic surgerymedicineHumansRobotic surgeryeducationOvarian malignancygynecologic oncology; minimally invasive surgery; ovarian cancer; robotic surgery; Obstetrics and Gynecologyminimally invasive surgeryNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesOvarian NeoplasmsCervical cancereducation.field_of_study030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicinebusiness.industryGeneral surgeryObstetrics and GynecologyGeneral MedicineEvidence-based medicinemedicine.diseasegynecologic oncology; minimally invasive surgery; ovarian cancer; robotic surgery; Case-Control Studies; Female; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence Local; Neoplasm Staging; Ovarian Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Treatment OutcomeTreatment Outcomeovarian cancerSettore MED/40 - GINECOLOGIA E OSTETRICIACase-Control Studies030220 oncology & carcinogenesisFemaleNeoplasm Recurrence LocalbusinessOvarian cancer
researchProduct

The da Vinci Xi Robotic Four-Arm Approach for Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

2018

AbstractRobotic surgery is gaining importance in complex thoracoscopic surgery, such as robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE). The RAMIE procedure was designed using the first generation of the robotic system. The latest da Vinci Xi system has substantially increased the dexterity, especially designed for multiquadrant surgery. The original three-arm RAMIE approach was modified including the robotic four-arm use for the thoracoscopic and laparoscopic part of the operation. This extended approach (four-arm RAMIE approach) provides more flexibility and raises the independence of the surgeon.

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicinemedicine.medical_specialtyRobotic assistedTreatment outcomePatient positioningPatient Positioning03 medical and health sciencesEsophagus0302 clinical medicineRobotic Surgical ProceduresInvasive esophagectomymedicineHumansRobotic surgerybusiness.industryThoracoscopyEquipment DesignFirst generationSurgeryEsophagectomyTreatment OutcomeEsophagus surgeryRobotic systems030220 oncology & carcinogenesisLaparoscopy030211 gastroenterology & hepatologySurgeryCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicinebusinessThe Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon
researchProduct

Colectomie droite par abord robotique. Recommandations formalisées d’experts sous l’égide de l’Association française de chirurgie (AFC)

2022

Twenty-seven experts under the aegis of the French Association of Surgery (AFC) offer this reference system with formalized recommendations concerning the performance of right colectomy by robotic approach (RRC). For RRC, experts suggest patient installation in the so-called “classic” or “suprapubic” setup. For patients undergoing right colectomy for a benign pathology or cancer, RRC provides no significant benefit in terms of intra-operative blood loss, intra-operative complications or conversion rate to open laparotomy compared to laparoscopy. At the same time, RRC is associated with significantly longer operating times. Data from the literature are insufficient to define whether the robo…

Right colon cancerMinimally invasive surgeryRight colectomyRobotic surgerySurgeryRecommendationsJournal de Chirurgie Viscérale
researchProduct

Comparative Study of the Initial Experience in Performing Robotic and Laparoscopic Right Hepatectomy with Technical Description of the Robotic Techni…

2017

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Despite potential benefits of robotic liver surgery, it is still considered a “development in progress” technique. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The outcomes of 14 patients undergoing robotic right hepatectomy were analyzed and compared with the results of 20 laparoscopic right hepatectomies consecutively performed by the same young surgeon. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The overall mean operative time was less in robotic arm (425 ± 139 vs. 565.18 ± 183.73, <i>p</i> = 0.022) and the estimated blood loss was similar (335.15 ± 139.8 vs. 423.95 ± 205.15, <i>p</i> = 0.17); no blood transf…

Robotic Surgical ProcedureSurgical marginmedicine.medical_specialtyBlood transfusionmedicine.medical_treatment030230 surgery03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineRobotic Surgical ProceduresBlood lossRetrospective StudiemedicineHumansHepatectomyRobotic surgeryRight HepatectomyRetrospective Studiesbusiness.industryMortality rateLiver NeoplasmsGastroenterologyRobotic surgerySurgical techniqueSurgeryFeasibility StudieLiver Neoplasm030220 oncology & carcinogenesisInitial phaseFeasibility StudiesLaparoscopySurgeryClinical CompetenceHepatectomybusinessRobotic armLearning CurveHumanDigestive Surgery
researchProduct

Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Technical Considerations

2017

Robotic surgery can help to overcome some technical limitations of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy thanks to EndoWrist instrumentations and the 3D view. Despite the potential benefits, its employment is still low and controversial. We focused on some important technical details crucial for a safe robotic pancreatectomy. After performing 52 robotic pancreatic resections that included 10 pancreatoduodenectomies, the authors describe their technique. The review of literature on robotic and laparoscopic duodenopancreatectomy is also performed in order to evaluate possible benefits of the robotic platform. We describe the step-by-step surgical procedure, analyzing all possible troubleshooti…

Robotic pancreatoduodenectomymedicine.medical_specialtymedicine.medical_treatmentTroubleshooting030230 surgery03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineBlood lossPediatric surgerymedicineRobotic surgeryOperative techniqueLearning curvebusiness.industryGeneral surgerytechnology industry and agriculturemedicine.diseasePancreaticoduodenectomybody regionssurgical procedures operativePancreatic fistula030220 oncology & carcinogenesisPancreatectomyOriginal ArticleSurgerybusinesshuman activitiesPancreatic fistulaLaparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomyIndian Journal of Surgery
researchProduct

Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse: a case-control study

2016

The apical prolapse has always been considered the most complex of the defects of the pelvic floor, for both the difficulty of the surgical corrective technique and for the high post-surgical recurrence rate. Today, the laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy can be considered the standard treatment for apical prolapse. In the last years, several author performed robotic sacrocolpopexy, obtaining positive results. So, we developed a case-control study in order to compare the surgical outcome of robotic group with a control group of laparoscopic approach in patients with symptomatic apical pro-lapsed between January 2015 and December 2015 at University Hospital Policlinico “P. Giaccone” and Ospedali Riu…

Sacrummedicine.medical_specialty03 medical and health sciencesGynecologic Surgical Procedures0302 clinical medicineRobotic Surgical ProceduresUterine ProlapsemedicineHumansLaparoscopic sacrocolpopexyRobotic surgeryRobotic surgery - Sacrocolpopexy - Robotic sacrocolpopexy - Laparoscopic surgery - Apical prolapse.LaparoscopyAgedPelvic floormedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryStandard treatmentCase-control studyRobotic Surgical ProceduresMiddle AgedSettore MED/40 - Ginecologia E OstetriciaSurgerySettore MED/18 - Chirurgia Generalemedicine.anatomical_structureApical prolapseCase-Control Studies030220 oncology & carcinogenesisVaginaFeasibility StudiesOriginal ArticleFemaleLaparoscopy030211 gastroenterology & hepatologybusiness
researchProduct