Search results for "Termini"
showing 10 items of 365 documents
Deterministic generalized automata
1995
A generalized automaton (GA) is a finite automaton where the single transitions are defined on words rather than on single letters. Generalized automata were considered by K. Hashiguchi who proved that the problem of calculating the size of a minimal GA is decidable.
The Complexity of Probabilistic versus Quantum Finite Automata
2002
We present a language Ln which is recognizable by a probabilistic finite automaton (PFA) with probability 1 - ? for all ? > 0 with O(log2 n) states, with a deterministic finite automaton (DFA) with O(n) states, but a quantum finite automaton (QFA) needs at least 2?(n/log n) states.
Non-constructive Methods for Finite Probabilistic Automata
2007
Size (the number of states) of finite probabilistic automata with an isolated cut-point can be exponentially smaller than the size of any equivalent finite deterministic automaton. The result is presented in two versions. The first version depends on Artin's Conjecture (1927) in Number Theory. The second version does not depend on conjectures but the numerical estimates are worse. In both versions the method of the proof does not allow an explicit description of the languages used. Since our finite probabilistic automata are reversible, these results imply a similar result for quantum finite automata.
NON-CONSTRUCTIVE METHODS FOR FINITE PROBABILISTIC AUTOMATA
2008
Size (the number of states) of finite probabilistic automata with an isolated cut-point can be exponentially smaller than the size of any equivalent finite deterministic automaton. However, the proof is non-constructive. The result is presented in two versions. The first version depends on Artin's Conjecture (1927) in Number Theory. The second version does not depend on conjectures not proved but the numerical estimates are worse. In both versions the method of the proof does not allow an explicit description of the languages used. Since our finite probabilistic automata are reversible, these results imply a similar result for quantum finite automata.
On a Conjecture by Christian Choffrut
2017
It is one of the most famous open problems to determine the minimum amount of states required by a deterministic finite automaton to distinguish a pair of strings, which was stated by Christian Choffrut more than thirty years ago. We investigate the same question for different automata models and we obtain new upper and lower bounds for some of them including alternating, ultrametric, quantum, and affine finite automata.
Nondeterministic operations on finite relational structures
1998
Abstract This article builds on a tutorial introduction to universal algebra for language theory (Courcelle, Theoret. Comput. Sci. 163 (1996) 1–54) and extends it in two directions. First, nondeterministic operations are considered, i.e., operations which give a set of results instead of a single one. Most of their properties concerning recognizability and equational definability carry over from the ordinary case with minor modifications. Second, inductive sets of evaluations are studied in greater detail. It seems that they are handled most naturally in the framework presented here. We consider the analogues of top-down and bottom-up tree transducers. Again, most of their closure propertie…
On extremal cases of Hopcroft’s algorithm
2010
AbstractIn this paper we consider the problem of minimization of deterministic finite automata (DFA) with reference to Hopcroft’s algorithm. Hopcroft’s algorithm has several degrees of freedom, so there can exist different executions that can lead to different sequences of refinements of the set of the states up to the final partition. We find an infinite family of binary automata for which such a process is unique, whatever strategy is chosen. Some recent papers (cf. Berstel and Carton (2004) [3], Castiglione et al. (2008) [6] and Berstel et al. (2009) [1]) have been devoted to find families of automata for which Hopcroft’s algorithm has its worst execution time. They are unary automata as…
Superiority Of One-Way And Realtime Quantum Machines
2012
In automata theory, quantum computation has been widely examined for finite state machines, known as quantum finite automata (QFAs), and less attention has been given to QFAs augmented with counters or stacks. In this paper, we focus on such generalizations of QFAs where the input head operates in one-way or realtime mode, and present some new results regarding their superiority over their classical counterparts. Our first result is about the nondeterministic acceptance mode: Each quantum model architecturally intermediate between realtime finite state automaton and one-way pushdown automaton (one-way finite automaton, realtime and one-way finite automata with one-counter, and realtime push…
Varieties and Covarieties of Languages (Extended Abstract)
2013
AbstractBecause of the isomorphism (X×A)→X≅X→(A→X), the transition structure of a deterministic automaton with state set X and with inputs from an alphabet A can be viewed both as an algebra and as a coalgebra. This algebra-coalgebra duality goes back to Arbib and Manes, who formulated it as a duality between reachability and observability, and is ultimately based on Kalmanʼs duality in systems theory between controllability and observability. Recently, it was used to give a new proof of Brzozowskiʼs minimization algorithm for deterministic automata. Here we will use the algebra-coalgebra duality of automata as a common perspective for the study of both varieties and covarieties, which are …
Nondeterministic Unitary OBDDs
2017
We investigate the width complexity of nondeterministic unitary OBDDs (NUOBDDs). Firstly, we present a generic lower bound on their widths based on the size of strong 1-fooling sets. Then, we present classically “cheap” functions that are “expensive” for NUOBDDs and vice versa by improving the previous gap. We also present a function for which neither classical nor unitary nondeterminism does help. Moreover, based on our results, we present a width hierarchy for NUOBDDs. Lastly, we provide the bounds on the widths of NUOBDDs for the basic Boolean operations negation, union, and intersection.