Search results for "UPS"

showing 10 items of 1425 documents

Upper body strength endurance evaluation: A comparison between the handgrip strength and three body weight tests

2021

BACKGROUND: The hand-grip strength test has been widely adopted to evaluate upper limb strength. Other field based tests as push-ups and pull-ups are commonly used for the same purpose. It is however unclear if these may be used interchangeably for upper body strength evaluation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate strength endurance of the upper body and understand which test could be the most appropriate for upper body evaluation. METHODS: Thirty-eight healthy young male participants were tested with three tests comprised of: 1) push-ups (PS), 2) pull-ups (PL) and 3) parallel dips (PD) performed to exhaustion. Grip strength (GS), total number of repetitions, time-…

OrthodonticsUpper bodybusiness.industryBiophysicsPhysical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation030229 sport sciencesBody weight03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineparallel dips pull-ups push-ups strength Strength endurance upper bodyMedicineOrthopedics and Sports Medicinebusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgeryIsokinetics and Exercise Science
researchProduct

Linguistic intergroup bias at school : an exploratory study of black and white children in France and their implicit attitude towards another

2014

International audience; " Linguistic intergroup bias " (LIB) (Maass et al., 2000) was investigated in French elementary schools between children of the French majority group (White children of European heritage) and a French minority group (Black children from Sub-Saharan Africa). Participants (N = 360; 7–11-year-old; mean age = 10.36, SD = .85) were shown photographs presenting a target character (ingroup or outgroup) engaging in a positive behavior (e.g., a helping action) or a negative behavior (e.g., an aggressive action). Demonstrations of ingroup favoritism with no outgroup derogation were expected for White children from the majority group. These hypotheses were confirmed. Unexpected…

Outgroup derogationIngroup favoritismLinguistic intergroup biasWhite (horse)DerogationMinority groupSociology and Political ScienceSocial PsychologyMajority/minority group4. EducationExploratory research[SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/PsychologyIngroups and outgroupsLinguisticsDevelopmental psychologyOutgroupIn-group favoritismBusiness and International ManagementImplicit attitudePsychologySocial psychologyComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
researchProduct

"Table 10" of "Inclusive $\Upsilon$ production in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV"

2020

$\Upsilon$(1S) $R_{\rm pPb}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ at backward rapidity at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a correlated systematic uncertainty.

P PB --> UPSILON(1S) X8160.0RPA
researchProduct

"Table 11" of "Inclusive $\Upsilon$ production in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV"

2020

$\Upsilon$(1S) $R_{\rm pPb}$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ at forward rapidity at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a correlated systematic uncertainty.

P PB --> UPSILON(1S) X8160.0RPA
researchProduct

"Table 9" of "Inclusive $\Upsilon$ production in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV"

2020

$\Upsilon$(1S) $R_{\rm pPb}$ as a function of $y_{\rm {cms}}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a correlated systematic uncertainty.

P PB --> UPSILON(1S) X8160.0RPA
researchProduct

"Table 1" of "Inclusive $\Upsilon$ production in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV"

2020

$\Upsilon$(1S) differential cross section as a function of $y_{\rm cms}$, in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, while the second is the systematic.

P PB --> UPSILON(1S) XDSIGMA/DY8160.0
researchProduct

"Table 13" of "Inclusive $\Upsilon$ production in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV"

2020

$\Upsilon$(1S) $Q_{\rm pPb}$ as a function of $$ at forward rapidity at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a correlated systematic uncertainty.

P PB --> UPSILON(1S) XHigh Energy Physics::Experiment8160.0QPA
researchProduct

"Table 12" of "Inclusive $\Upsilon$ production in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV"

2020

$\Upsilon$(1S) $Q_{\rm pPb}$ as a function of $$ at backward rapidity at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a correlated systematic uncertainty.

P PB --> UPSILON(1S) XHigh Energy Physics::Experiment8160.0QPA
researchProduct

"Table 14" of "Inclusive $\Upsilon$ production in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV"

2020

$\Upsilon$(1S) $R_{\rm pPb}$ values at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a correlated systematic uncertainty.

P PB --> UPSILON(1S) XHigh Energy Physics::Experiment8160.0RPA
researchProduct

"Table 8" of "Inclusive $\Upsilon$ production in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV"

2020

$\Upsilon$(1S) $R_{\rm pPb}$ values at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a correlated systematic uncertainty.

P PB --> UPSILON(1S) XHigh Energy Physics::Experiment8160.0RPA
researchProduct