Search results for "WHODAS"

showing 2 items of 2 documents

Psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among general populati…

2019

WHODAS 2.0 is a unified scale to measuring disability across diseases, countries, and cultures. The objective was to explore the available evidence on the psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered WHODAS 2.0 among a general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability.Five databases Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO were searched for papers related to the validity, reliability, responsiveness, minimal clinically important difference or minimal detectable change of 12-item self-administered WHODAS 2.0. In order to avoid missing any potentially relevant studies, the search clauses were left as generic as possible and the refining search was…

Adultpsychometrics030506 rehabilitationPsychometricsPsychometricsdisability evaluationPopulationWHODASWorld Health OrganizationfunctioningDisability EvaluationYoung Adult03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinevammaisuusInternational Classification of Functioning Disability and HealthFloor effectHumansDisabled Personstoimintarajoitteeteducationfloor effecteducation.field_of_studyconsistencyRehabilitationReproducibility of Resultsinternational classification of functioningpsykometriikkaSchedule (workplace)ceiling effectdisability and healthScale (social sciences)Self-AdministeredCeiling effectFemalereproducibility of results0305 other medical sciencePsychologyterveysarviointi030217 neurology & neurosurgeryClinical psychology
researchProduct

Minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0…

2020

Objectives: The aim of this study is to estimate a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and a minimal detectable change (MDC) of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 amongst patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Design: Cross-sectional cohort study. Setting: Outpatient Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine clinic. Subjects: A total of 1988 consecutive patients with musculoskeletal pain. Interventions: A distribution-based approach was employed to estimate a minimal clinically important difference, a minimal detectable change, and a minimal detectable percent change (MDC%). Results: The mean age of the patients was 48 years, and 65% were women. The average intensity of pain was 6,3 (2.0) po…

MaleMusculoskeletal painSchedule2019-20 coronavirus outbreakmedicine.medical_specialtyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)WHODASPhysical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitationminimal detectable changetuki- ja liikuntaelimetWorld healthDisability assessmentCohort StudiesDisability EvaluationMusculoskeletal PainHumansMedicineskin and connective tissue diseasesmusculoskeletal painPain Measurementbusiness.industryMinimal clinically important differenceminimal clinically important differenceRehabilitationkipuMiddle AgedCross-Sectional StudiesPhysical therapyFemalesense organsWhodasChronic PainbusinessData Collection toolsClinical Rehabilitation
researchProduct