Search results for "appropriatness"

showing 2 items of 2 documents

Appropriateness guidelines and predictive rules to select patients for upper endoscopy: a nationwide multicenter study.

2010

OBJECTIVES: Selecting patients appropriately for upper endoscopy (EGD) is crucial for efficient use of endoscopy. The objective of this study was to compare different clinical strategies and statistical methods to select patients for EGD, namely appropriateness guidelines, age and/or alarm features, and multivariate and artificial neural network (ANN) models. METHODS: A nationwide, multicenter, prospective study was undertaken in which consecutive patients referred for EGD during a 1-month period were enrolled. Before EGD, the endoscopist assessed referral appropriateness according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines, also collecting clinical and demogra…

AdultMaleupper endoscopymedicine.medical_specialtyPediatricsAppropriateness Upper EndoscopyAdolescentCross-sectional studySettore MED/12 - GASTROENTEROLOGIADigestive System DiseasesMEDLINEappropriatnessYoung Adultappropriatness; upper endoscopy; multicenter studymedicineHumansEndoscopy Digestive SystemProspective StudiesProspective cohort studyAgedAged 80 and overHepatologymedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryEsophagogastroduodenoscopyPatient SelectionUpper endoscopyGastroenterologyNeural Networks (Computer)Middle AgedEndoscopyClinical trialSettore MED/18 - Chirurgia Generalemulticenter studyCross-Sectional StudiesLogistic ModelsMulticenter studyItalyROC CurveEmergency medicinePractice Guidelines as TopicFemaleNeural Networks ComputerbusinessThe American journal of gastroenterology
researchProduct

How to predict a high rate of inappropriateness for upper endoscopy in an endoscopic centre?

2010

Abstract BACKGROUND: Inappropriateness of upper endoscopy (EGD) indication causes decreased diagnostic yield. Our aim of was to identify predictors of appropriateness rate for EGD among endoscopic centres. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of two multicentre cross-sectional studies, including 6270 and 8252 patients consecutively referred to EGD in 44 (group A) and 55 (group B) endoscopic Italian centres in 2003 and 2007, respectively, was performed. A multiple forward stepwise regression was applied to group A, and independently validated in group B. A <70% threshold was adopted to define inadequate appropriateness rate clustered by centre. RESULTS: discrete variability of clustered appropriaten…

AdultPediatricsmedicine.medical_specialtyappropriatnessGroup BUpper Gastrointestinal TractAge DistributionMedicineHumansAppropriatenessEndoscopy Digestive SystemendoscopyReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographySettore MED/12 - GastroenterologiaHepatologybusiness.industryPatient SelectionUpper endoscopyupper endoscopy; appropriatness; endoscopyGastroenterologyRetrospective cohort studyStepwise regressionMiddle AgedAppropriateness Upper endoscopySettore MED/18 - Chirurgia GeneraleAppropriateness; Upper endoscopyItalyROC CurveUpper endoscopyPractice Guidelines as TopicAge distributionbusiness
researchProduct