Search results for "consequentialism"

showing 4 items of 4 documents

�Cu�l es la funci�n de los valores en el cine?: Apuntes sobre la �cr�tica �tica del arte�

2018

In this paper we raise the question of whether moral values play any decisive role in cinematographic art (and, therefore, whether film can or not influence the behavior of the spectator). To this end, we will first introduce the controversy between two opposing positions: the “(moralist) consequentialism” and the “(aestheticist) autonomism”; secondly, we will propose an alternative to this approaches based on some notions of two contemporary philosophers of film: David Bordwell and Noel Carroll. Our overall objective will be to present the main lines of this debate – centered on the relationship between Ethics and Aesthetics – and point out the different positions involved.

PhilosophyConsequentialismAutonomismAestheticismCognitivism (ethics)Philosophy of filmHumanitiesOx�mora. Revista Internacional de �tica y Pol�tica
researchProduct

The Consequentialism of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights : Towards the Fulfilment of ‘Do No Harm’

2019

In this paper I demonstrate that the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) leans heavily on consequentialism to inform the corporate responsibility to respect to human rights. Through the conception of ‘human rights impacts’, the UNGPs adopt a standard of human rights-based negative act consequentialism, capturing any business act that has the outcome of ‘removing or reducing’ an individual’s enjoyment of human rights. Such a lens is necessary because deontological human rights rules inadequately capture the full scope of global business harm to human rights. Consequentialist responsibility offers a much wider scope, of particular use around systemic, macro-level, harm,…

UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rightsconsequentialismcorporate powerbusiness and human rightsdo no harm
researchProduct

Etica della popolazione. Paradossi, intuizioni e metodo

2020

This paper is an introduction to the contemporary debate on population ethics. As it is shown at the beginning, the paradoxes of population ethics do not pose a problem just for Utilitarianism, but also for everyone who shares a set of very common intuitions. Different proposals for a solution are described, each of which proves ineffective. At the end of the paper two different methods of moral reasoning are distinguished depending on whether accepting counter-intuitive conclusions is allowed or not.

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittomoral psychologyconsequentialismJoshua Greenereflective equilibriumtrolley problem
researchProduct

Rivoluzione morale. Struttura, limiti e risorse nascoste del progetto filosofico di Joshua Greene

2020

This article analyzes Joshua Greene’s defense of a consequentialist approach to ethics, through a series of debunking arguments targeting characteristically deontological judgments and common-sense intuitions. This project is not new in ethics, but Greene develops his predecessors’ speculations by means of the recent findings in moral psychology. Greene’s conclusion is a moral revolution about the conception of harm and the duties to help strangers. The article focuses also on Frances Kamm and Guy Kahane’s critique to Greene’s theses and method. Kahane’s critique is used to give a subjectivist interpretation of Greene’s account which may constitute an unexplored answer to some methodologica…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittomoral psychologyconsequentialismJoshua Greenereflective equilibriumtrolley problem
researchProduct