Search results for "formal"

Lagrangians, Hamiltonians and Noether’s Theorem

2015

This chapter is intended to remind the basic notions of the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms as well as Noether’s theorem. We shall first start with a discrete system with N degrees of freedom, state and prove Noether’s theorem. Afterwards we shall generalize all the previously introduced notions to continuous systems and prove the generic formulation of Noether’s Theorem. Finally we will reproduce a few well known results in Quantum Field Theory.

A formal proof of the ε-optimality of absorbing continuous pursuit algorithms using the theory of regular functions

2014

Published version of an article from the journal: Applied Intelligence. Also available on Springerlink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10489-014-0541-1 The most difficult part in the design and analysis of Learning Automata (LA) consists of the formal proofs of their convergence accuracies. The mathematical techniques used for the different families (Fixed Structure, Variable Structure, Discretized etc.) are quite distinct. Among the families of LA, Estimator Algorithms (EAs) are certainly the fastest, and within this family, the set of Pursuit algorithms have been considered to be the pioneering schemes. Informally, if the environment is stationary, their ε-optimality is defined as their abili…

On the use of relational expressions in the design of efficient algorithms

2005

Relational expressions have finite binary relations as arguments and the operations are composition (·), closure (*), inverse (−1), and union (U). The efficient computation of the relation denoted by a relational expression is considered, and a tight bound is established on the complexity of the algorithm suggested by Hunt, Szymanski and Ullman. The result implies a unified method for deriving efficient algorithms for many problems in parsing. For example, optimal algorithms are derived for strong LL(1) and strong LL(2) parser construction and an efficient polynomialtime algorithm is derived for determining the inessential error entries in an LR(1) parsing table.

Universal Lyndon Words

2014

A word w over an alphabet Σ is a Lyndon word if there exists an order defined on Σ for which w is lexicographically smaller than all of its conjugates (other than itself). We introduce and study universal Lyndon words, which are words over an n-letter alphabet that have length n! and such that all the conjugates are Lyndon words. We show that universal Lyndon words exist for every n and exhibit combinatorial and structural properties of these words. We then define particular prefix codes, which we call Hamiltonian lex-codes, and show that every Hamiltonian lex-code is in bijection with the set of the shortest unrepeated prefixes of the conjugates of a universal Lyndon word. This allows us t…

Lipschitz conditions,b-arcwise connectedness and conformal mappings

1982

On the computational power of affine automata

2017

We investigate the computational power of affine automata (AfAs) introduced in [4]. In particular, we present a simpler proof for how to change the cutpoint for any affine language and a method how to reduce error in bounded error case. Moreover, we address to the question of [4] by showing that any affine language can be recognized by an AfA with certain limitation on the entries of affine states and transition matrices. Lastly, we present the first languages shown to be not recognized by AfAs with bounded-error.

Minimal forbidden words and symbolic dynamics

1996

We introduce a new complexity measure of a factorial formal language L: the growth rate of the set of minimal forbidden words. We prove some combinatorial properties of minimal forbidden words. As main result we prove that the growth rate of the set of minimal forbidden words for L is a topological invariant of the dynamical system defined by L.

Nondeterministic operations on finite relational structures

1998

Abstract This article builds on a tutorial introduction to universal algebra for language theory (Courcelle, Theoret. Comput. Sci. 163 (1996) 1–54) and extends it in two directions. First, nondeterministic operations are considered, i.e., operations which give a set of results instead of a single one. Most of their properties concerning recognizability and equational definability carry over from the ordinary case with minor modifications. Second, inductive sets of evaluations are studied in greater detail. It seems that they are handled most naturally in the framework presented here. We consider the analogues of top-down and bottom-up tree transducers. Again, most of their closure propertie…

On extremal cases of Hopcroft’s algorithm

2010

AbstractIn this paper we consider the problem of minimization of deterministic finite automata (DFA) with reference to Hopcroft’s algorithm. Hopcroft’s algorithm has several degrees of freedom, so there can exist different executions that can lead to different sequences of refinements of the set of the states up to the final partition. We find an infinite family of binary automata for which such a process is unique, whatever strategy is chosen. Some recent papers (cf. Berstel and Carton (2004) [3], Castiglione et al. (2008) [6] and Berstel et al. (2009) [1]) have been devoted to find families of automata for which Hopcroft’s algorithm has its worst execution time. They are unary automata as…

Counting with Probabilistic and Ultrametric Finite Automata

2014

We investigate the state complexity of probabilistic and ultrametric finite automata for the problem of counting, i.e. recognizing the one-word unary language \(C_n=\left\{ 1^n \right\} \). We also review the known results for other types of automata.