Search results for "geodiversiteetti"

showing 2 items of 2 documents

Does catchment geodiversity foster stream biodiversity?

2019

Abstract Context One approach to maintain the resilience of biotic communities is to protect the variability of abiotic characteristics of Earth’s surface, i.e. geodiversity. In terrestrial environments, the relationship between geodiversity and biodiversity is well recognized. In streams, the abiotic properties of upstream catchments influence stream communities, but the relationships between catchment geodiversity and aquatic biodiversity have not been previously tested. Objectives The aim was to compare the effects of local environmental and catchment variables on stream biodiversity. We specifically explored the usefulness of catchment geodiversity in explaining the species richness on …

0106 biological sciencesGeography Planning and DevelopmentDrainage basinBiodiversity01 natural sciencesbakteeritfreshwatersspecies richnessbacteriaSCALEAbiotic componentFreshwatersgeography.geographical_feature_categoryCLIMATE-CHANGEEcologyMacroinvertebratesEcologyenvironmental heterogeneityselkärangattomatgeodiversiteettiHabitatCatchment featuresvirtavedet1181 Ecology evolutionary biologyBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE ASSEMBLAGESvaluma-alueetmacroinvertebratesCONTEXT DEPENDENCY010603 evolutionary biologydiatomsPLANT-SPECIES RICHNESSpiilevätcatchment features1172 Environmental sciencesNature and Landscape ConservationDiatomsgeographyLand useBacteriaFRESH-WATER BIODIVERSITYLAND-USELANDSCAPE010604 marine biology & hydrobiologyEnvironmental heterogeneity15. Life on landCOMMUNITY-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONSHIPSluonnon monimuotoisuusbiodiversiteettiGeodiversity13. Climate actionSpecies richnessLandscape ecologySpecies richnessMICROBIAL DIVERSITY
researchProduct

The role of landscape, topography, and geodiversity in explaining vascular plant species richness in a fragmented landscape

2016

We explained vascular plant species richness patterns in a 286 km(2) fragmented landscape with a notable human influence. The objective of this study was two-fold: to test the relative importance of landscape, topography and geodiversity measures, and to compare three different landscape-type variables in species richness modeling. Moreover, we tested if results differ when only native species are considered. We used generalized linear modeling based variation partitioning and generalized additive models with different explanatory variable sets. Landscape and topography explained the majority of the variation but the relative importance of topography and geodiversity was higher in explainin…

NORTHERN FINLANDLAND-COVER DATAspecies diversityspecies richness modelingDIVERSITYGENERALIZED LINEAR-MODELSENVIRONMENTAL HETEROGENEITYCLASSIFICATIONgeodiversiteettitopografiaputkilokasvitPATTERNSDISTRIBUTIONSBIODIVERSITYfragmented landscapeSCALE1172 Environmental sciences
researchProduct