Search results for "olmesartan"
showing 9 items of 9 documents
Angiotensin II antagonists - an assessment of their acute toxicity.
2013
In Germany, increasing prescription rates of angiotensin II antagonists resulted in rising enquiries to Poisons Information Centres (PICs) during the last decade. Therefore, we aimed to assess their acute toxicity for deriving triage recommendations.An observational case series with data collected retrospectively from eight PICs in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Inclusion criteria were monoexposure, defined dose, and documented follow-up.In total, 206 cases of exposures to angiotensin II antagonists were included (candesartan, 94; eprosartan, 3; irbesartan, 20; losartan, 26; olmesartan, 16; telmisartan, 18; and valsartan, 29). The median dose expressed as a multiple of their maximum dail…
Comparative study of the efficacy of olmesartan/amlodipine vs. perindopril/amlodipine in peripheral blood pressure after missed dose in type 2 diabet…
2016
Introduction: Combination therapy is needed to control blood pressure (BP) in a large number of hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus. Adherence to treatment is a major clinical problem; therefore, the time duration of the antihypertensive action of a drug determines BP control when a dose is skipped. Objectives: The aim was to determine whether the fixed-dose combination of olmesartan/amlodipine provides equal efficacy and safety as the perindopril/amlodipine combination when a drug dose is missed. Methods: In this noninferiority trial with a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy parallel group, controlled design, 260 patients received either olmesartan 20-40 mg/amlodipine 5-10 mg …
Could HLA-DQ suggest why some patients have olmesartan-related diarrhea and others don't?
2015
Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Olmesartan/Amlodipine vs. Perindopril/Amlodipine in Peripheral and Central Blood Pressure Parameters After Misse…
2016
Background Central aortic blood pressure (CBP) and CBP-derived parameters are independent predictors of cardiovascular risk. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors plus calcium channel blockers are the recommended first-line treatments in hypertensive diabetic patients; however, the effect in reducing CBP when a dose is skipped has not been established yet. The aim was to determine whether the fixed-dose combination of olmesartan/amlodipine (OLM/AML) provides equal efficacy and safety as the perindopril/AML (PER/AML) combination in reducing CBP, augmentation index (AIx), and pulse wave velocity (PWV) when a drug dose is missed. Methods In this no…
Efficacy in angiotensin receptor blockade: a comparative review of data with olmesartan
2009
A range of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) is available, and analyses suggest there are differences between agents in terms of antihypertensive efficacy and 24-hour blood pressure control.This review assesses the data comparing olmesartan with other ARBs in terms of blood pressure reductions, goal achievement, 24-hour control and speed of onset. Olmesartan seems to have a more favourable efficacy profile relative to standard doses of the ARBs used in comparative studies; results consistent with the high degree of blockade of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor for olmesartan.Taken together, there might be differences between ARBs regarding their blood pressure lowering efficacy, and …
Comparative effectiveness of an angiotensin receptor blocker, olmesartan medoxomil, in older hypertensive patients
2018
The efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) vs active control (AC) monotherapy among elderly patients aged 60‐79 years (N = 4487) was evaluated by meta‐analysis (25 studies). In all patients, change from baseline to end point in blood pressure (BP) was significantly greater with OM vs AC (−19.5/−11.9 vs −16.8/−10.7 mm Hg). Greater proportions of OM‐ vs AC‐treated patients achieved BP goals. In patients with impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), OM treatment resulted in a greater mean change from baseline in systolic BP vs AC (−21.2 vs −18.7 mm Hg, respectively) and a greater proportion of patients achieving BP goals. These parameters w…
Meta-analysis of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) monotherapy in reducing blood pressure (BP) in elderly patients with hypertension (HTN)
2015
Meta-analysis of blood pressure (BP) reductions with olmesartan medoxomil (OM) compared with active control (AC) in patients (pts) with hypertension (HTN) Josep Redon,y, 6 Prakash Deedwania, Kazuomi Kario, Jiguang Wang, Joris Versteden, Paul-Egbert Reimitz. Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany; Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany; Jichi University School of Medicine, Japan; Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Shanghai, China; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States; University of Valencia, Madrid, Spain
Effect of antihypertensive treatment with a combination of telmisartan and amlodipine on vascular structure and function
2013
Meta-analysis of blood pressure (BP) reductions with olmesartan medoxomil (OM) compared with active control (AC) in patients (pts) with hypertension …
2015
Meta-analysis of blood pressure (BP) reductions with olmesartan medoxomil (OM) compared with active control (AC) in patients (pts) with hypertension (HTN) Josep Redon,y, 6 Prakash Deedwania, Kazuomi Kario, Jiguang Wang, Joris Versteden, Paul-Egbert Reimitz. Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany; Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany; Jichi University School of Medicine, Japan; Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Shanghai, China; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States; University of Valencia, Madrid, Spain