Search results for "opinion"

showing 10 items of 389 documents

Calibrating Expert Assessments Using Hierarchical Gaussian Process Models

2020

Expert assessments are routinely used to inform management and other decision making. However, often these assessments contain considerable biases and uncertainties for which reason they should be calibrated if possible. Moreover, coherently combining multiple expert assessments into one estimate poses a long-standing problem in statistics since modeling expert knowledge is often difficult. Here, we present a hierarchical Bayesian model for expert calibration in a task of estimating a continuous univariate parameter. The model allows experts' biases to vary as a function of the true value of the parameter and according to the expert's background. We follow the fully Bayesian approach (the s…

0106 biological sciencesComputer sciencepäätöksentekoRECONCILIATIONInferencecomputer.software_genre01 natural sciencesSTOCK ASSESSMENTenvironmental management010104 statistics & probabilityJUDGMENTSELICITATIONkalakantojen hoito111 Mathematicstilastolliset mallitReliability (statistics)Applied Mathematicsgaussiset prosessitfisheries sciencebias correctionexpert elicitationPROBABILITY62P1260G15symbols62F15Statistics and ProbabilityarviointimenetelmätBayesian probabilityenvironmental management.Bayesian inferenceMachine learningHEURISTICSsymbols.namesakeasiantuntijatMANAGEMENT0101 mathematicsGaussian processGaussian processCATCH LIMITSbusiness.industrybayesilainen menetelmä010604 marine biology & hydrobiologyUnivariateExpert elicitationOPINIONSupra BayesArtificial intelligenceHeuristicsbusinessFISHERIEScomputerBayesian Analysis
researchProduct

Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87751 for food and feed uses under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2014‐121)

2018

Abstract Soybean MON 87751 was developed through Agrobacterium tumefaciens‐mediated transformation to provide protection certain specific lepidopteran pests by the expression of the Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab2 proteins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses did not identify issues requiring assessment for food and feed safety. None of the compositional, agronomic and phenotypic differences identified between soybean MON 87751 and the conventional counterpart required further assessment. The GMO Panel did not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab2 proteins as expressed in soybean MO…

0106 biological sciencesCry1AVeterinary (miscellaneous)Plant ScienceTP1-1185Biology01 natural sciencesMicrobiologyGenetically modified soybeansoybean (Glycinemax)MON877510404 agricultural biotechnologyEnvironmental safetyBacillus thuringiensisTX341-641Cry2Ab2Cry1A.105Animal healthbusiness.industryGMONutrition. Foods and food supplyChemical technologyfungiRegulation (EC) No 1829/2003food and beverages10504 agricultural and veterinary sciencesbiology.organism_classification040401 food scienceBiotechnologySettore AGR/02 - Agronomia E Coltivazioni ErbaceeSettore AGR/11 - Entomologia Generale E ApplicataScientific OpinionMON 87751insect resistantAnimal Science and ZoologyParasitologybusinesssoybean (Glycine max)010606 plant biology & botanyFood ScienceRegulation (EC) No 1829/2003EFSA Journal
researchProduct

Scientific Opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2013‐117 for authorisation of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 and subcombinati…

2017

Scientific opinionRequestor: Competent Authority of BelgiumQuestion number: EFSA-Q-2013-00765; In this opinion, the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) assessed the three-event stack maize MON 87427 9 MON 89034 9 NK603 and its three subcombinations, independently of their origin. The GMO Panel has previously assessed the three single events combined to produce this three-event stack maize and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events, leading to modification of the original conclusions on their safety, were identified. Based on the molecular, agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics, the combination of the single maize events and …

0106 biological sciencesCry1Aherbicide tolerancemaïsVeterinary (miscellaneous)gmo[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]MON87427xMON89034xNK603ogmPlant Science010501 environmental sciencesmaizeCP4EPSPS01 natural sciencesMicrobiologyzea maysMON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603Cry2Ab2CP4 EPSPS0105 earth and related environmental sciences2. Zero hungerCP4 EPSPSCry1A.105indian cornRegulation (EC) No 1829/2003105GMO;maize;herbicide tolerance;insect resistance;CP4 EPSPS;Cry1A.105;Cry2Ab2;Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003;MON 87427 x MON 89034 x NK603MON 87427 9 MON 89034 9 NK603Scientific OpinionRegulation (EC) No1829/2003Animal Science and ZoologyParasitologyinsect resistance010606 plant biology & botanyFood ScienceRegulation (EC) No 1829/2003
researchProduct

Collating science-based evidence to inform public opinion on the environmental effects of marine drilling platforms in the Mediterranean Sea.

2017

Abstract The use of rigorous methodologies to assess environmental, social and health impacts of specific interventions is crucial to disentangle the various components of environmental questions and to inform public opinion. The power of systematic maps relies on the capacity to summarise and organise the areas or relationships most studied, and to highlight key gaps in the evidence base. The recent Italian technical referendum (2016) – a public consultation inviting people to express their opinion by voting to change the rules on the length of licence duration and the decommissioning of offshore oil and gas platform drilling licences – inspired the creation of a systematic map of evidence…

0106 biological sciencesEngineeringEnvironmental EngineeringOil and Gas FieldGood Environmental StatusDrillingOil and Gas Industry010501 environmental sciencesManagement Monitoring Policy and LawEnvironmentPublic opinion01 natural sciencesReferendumMediterranean SeaHumansEcosystem componentOil and Gas FieldsDuration (project management)Baseline (configuration management)Waste Management and Disposal0105 earth and related environmental sciencesGood environmental statuScope (project management)business.industry010604 marine biology & hydrobiologyEnvironmental resource managementSystematic mapPublic consultationGeneral MedicinePublic OpinionInformational gapbusinessNexus (standard)HumanJournal of environmental management
researchProduct

A preliminary approach for modelling the effects of cropping systems on the dynamics of broomrape ( Phelipanche ramosa) in interaction with the non-p…

2011

International audience; The current decrease in herbicide use may increase and diversify weed flora in crops as well as companion bioagressors spreading via weeds. Among these bioagressors is Phelipanche ramosa (L.) Pomel, a parastic plant which is very harmful on oilseed rape. The objective of the present work was to develop a new model (called PheraSys) of the effects of cropping systems on parasite dynamics, in interaction with non-parasitic weed hosts. The structure of this first model version was based on models developed for other parasitic plants and on FlorSys which quantifies the effects of cropping systems on non-parasitic weed flora. PheraSys was parametrized with preliminary val…

0106 biological sciencesFloraoilseed rapeParasitic plant[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]lcsh:TP670-699cropping system01 natural sciencesBiochemistryBrassica napus L[SDV.IDA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food engineering[SDV.BV]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Vegetal Biology[SDV.BV] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Vegetal BiologyCropping systemparasitic plantmodelbiologyHost (biology)broomrapePHELIPANCHE RAMOSA04 agricultural and veterinary sciencesbiology.organism_classification[SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio]Phelipanche ramosaAgronomyExpert opinion040103 agronomy & agriculture0401 agriculture forestry and fisherieslcsh:Oils fats and waxesWeedCroppingPhelipanche ramosa L PomelPhelipanche ramosa (L.) Pomel010606 plant biology & botanyFood Scienceweed
researchProduct

Potential of an exploitation of acid-tolerant antimicrobial microorganisms evolving enzyme systems for the utilization of dairy by-products and ligno…

2016

Introduction Bioproduction of optically pure lactic acid (LA) has roused interest in the recent years due to its potential application in a wide range of fields, and there is a significant interest to further development of sustainable and cost-effective process. However, the efficient utilization of agro-industrial wastes for LA production still causes considerable challenges. The biotechnological LA production within the targeted cost still required the development of high-performance LA-producing microorganisms and the lowering of the costs of raw materials and fermentation process. Cheap biomass, such as starchy and cellulosic agricultural residues or by-products from the food industry,…

0106 biological sciencesOpinionHistologyMicroorganismcheese whey ; lignocellulosic substrate ; lactic acid bacteria ; enzyme activities ; lactic acid production ; fermentation processBiomedical EngineeringLignocellulosic biomassBioengineering01 natural sciences7. Clean energychemistry.chemical_compoundcheese whey010608 biotechnologyFood sciencelignocellulosic substrate2. Zero hungerchemistry.chemical_classification010405 organic chemistrybusiness.industryBioengineering and Biotechnologyfood and beveragesAntimicrobialfermentation process0104 chemical sciencesBiotechnologyLactic acidlactic acid bacteriaEnzymechemistryenzyme activities13. Climate actionFermentationlactic acid productionbusinessAcid tolerantBiotechnology
researchProduct

Can biological structures be natural and sustainable capsules?

2015

Flavor and fragrance molecules are used in many industrial fields such as food, cosmetics, tissues, pharmacy, agriculture (pheromones) etc. As most actives have a specific target and are fragile molecules, encapsulation processes have been developed for their use. These technologies are efficient to avoid loss of actives, dissemination out of the target and subsequent pollution, and to protect molecules up to their target. Several processes have been developed responding to the numerous situations encountered (e.g., protection against air, temperature, light, pH; masking or revealing sensorial properties of the molecule; release during the process, in the plate, in the mouth, etc.). However…

0106 biological sciencesOpinionmedia_common.quotation_subjectLab scaleNanotechnology02 engineering and technologyBiology01 natural sciencesCosmeticslcsh:Chemistry010608 biotechnologynatural capsulesactivesComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSmedia_common2. Zero hungerNatural materialsbiological structuresGeneral Chemistry021001 nanoscience & nanotechnologySustainable processprotection[SDV.BBM.BP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biochemistry Molecular Biology/BiophysicsChemistrylcsh:QD1-999fragrances13. Climate actionBiological structureSustainabilityBiochemical engineering0210 nano-technologycontrolled releasenatural capsuleGermanic Countriescontrolled release.Frontiers in Chemistry
researchProduct

Implications of the EFSA Scientific Opinion on Site Directed Nucleases 1 and 2 for Risk Assessment of Genome-Edited Plants in the EU

2021

Genome editing is a set of techniques for introducing targeted changes in genomes. It may be achieved by enzymes collectively called site-directed nucleases (SDN). Site-specificity of SDNs is provided either by the DNA binding domain of the protein molecule itself or by RNA molecule(s) that direct SDN to a specific site in the genome. In contrast to transgenesis resulting in the insertion of exogenous DNA, genome editing only affects specific endogenous sequences. Therefore, multiple jurisdictions around the world have exempted certain types of genome-edited organisms from national biosafety regulations completely, or on a case-by-case basis. In the EU, however, the ruling of the Court of J…

0106 biological sciencesSDN-2SDN-1Mutagenesis (molecular biology technique)Computational biology01 natural sciencesGenomegenome-edited organismlcsh:Agriculture03 medical and health sciencesBiosafetyGenome editingsite-directed nucleasegenetically modified organismJustice (ethics)EFSA opinion030304 developmental biology0303 health sciencesScope (project management)business.industrylcsh:SFood safetyDirectiveBusinessAgronomy and Crop Science010606 plant biology & botanyAgronomy
researchProduct

The author's reply to N.R. Haddaway.

2017

Abstract In this reply we respond to the commentary of Dr. Haddaway addressed in searching for pitfalls in our systematic mapping exercise “Collating science-based evidence to inform public opinion on the environmental effects of marine drilling platforms in the Mediterranean Sea” recently published in Journal of Environmental Management (Mangano, M.C. and Sara, G. 2017. Journal of Environmental Management 188: 195–202). We discussed each so called “pitfalls” and, in our opinion, the main cornerstones of systematic map – SM (repeatability, comprehensiveness, transparency, traceability, quality, generalizability) are safe guaranteeing the “gold standard” required by this technique. Where nee…

0106 biological sciencesSettore BIO/07 - EcologiaEngineeringEnvironmental EngineeringTailoringmedia_common.quotation_subject010501 environmental sciencesManagement Monitoring Policy and LawPublic opinionTransparency010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesMediterranean SeaQuality (business)Operations managementGeneralizability theoryRepeatabilityBaseline (configuration management)Waste Management and Disposal0105 earth and related environmental sciencesmedia_commonMinimum requirementProtocol (science)End userbusiness.industrySystematic mapGeneral MedicineComprehensiveneData scienceTransparency (behavior)Public OpinionbusinessNexus (standard)Journal of environmental management
researchProduct

Assessment of genetically modified maize Bt11 x MIR162 x 1507 x GA21 and three subcombinations independently of their origin, for food and feed uses …

2018

In this opinion, the GMO Panel assessed the four-event stack maize Btll x MIR162 x 1507 x GA21 and three of its subcombinations, independently of their origin. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single events and seven of their combinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events or the seven subcombinations leading to modification of the original conclusions were identified. Based on the molecular, agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics, the combination of the single events in the four-event stack maize did not give rise to food/feed safety issues. Based on the nutritional assessment of the compositional characteristics of maize Btll …

0106 biological sciencesVeterinary (miscellaneous)[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]Context (language use)Plant Science010501 environmental sciencesBiology01 natural sciencesMicrobiologyGA21Plant scienceEnvironmental safetyinsect resistant and herbicide tolerantmaize (Zea mays)15070105 earth and related environmental sciences2. Zero hungerGenetically modified maizebusiness.industryGMOMIR162Bt11BiotechnologyGenetically modified organismScientific OpinionAnimal Science and ZoologyParasitologybusiness010606 plant biology & botanyFood Science
researchProduct