0000000000016607

AUTHOR

Hans Timm

showing 4 related works from this author

A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the plaque removal efficacy of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush versus a sonic toothbrush in orthodontic pa…

2018

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the plaque removal efficacy of an oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush with an orthodontic brush head versus a sonic toothbrush in adolescent patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized, examiner-blind, replicate single-use, two-treatment, four-period, crossover study with a washout period between visits of approximately 24 hours. Forty-four adolescent patients with fixed orthodontic appliances in both arches were randomized based on a computer-generated randomization schedule to one of four toothbrush treatment sequences. The primary outcome was plaque score change from baseline, measured using digital plaque i…

ToothbrushingAdolescentPlaque removalDentistryAnterior dentitionOrthodonticsOral hygienelaw.invention03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineRandomized controlled trialOrthodontic ApplianceslawMedicineDentitionHumansSingle-Blind Method030212 general & internal medicineCross-Over Studiesbusiness.industryDental Plaque IndexBrush030206 dentistryEquipment DesignOriginal ArticlesToothbrushbusinessThe Angle orthodontist
researchProduct

Comparative assessment of plaque removal and motivation between a manual toothbrush and an interactive power toothbrush in adolescents with fixed ort…

2019

Introduction The objective of this 2-arm parallel trial was to determine the plaque removal efficacy (main outcome) and the motivation assessment (secondary outcome) comparing a manual versus an interactive power toothbrush in orthodontic patients. Methods Sixty adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances in both arches were randomized in a 1:1 ratio in this parallel, randomized, examiner-blind controlled clinical trial. Eligibility criteria included at least 16 natural teeth, 1-6 “focus care areas,” plaque score of ≥1.75, no severe caries, gingivitis and periodontitis, no dental prophylaxis, no smoking, no antibiotics, and no chlorhexidine mouth rinse. Subjects were to brush unsupervised…

Periodontitisbusiness.industryDental ProphylaxisChlorhexidineDentistryOrthodontics030206 dentistrymedicine.diseaseSingle CenterDental Plaque Indexlaw.inventionClinical trial03 medical and health sciencesGingivitis0302 clinical medicineRandomized controlled triallawMedicinemedicine.symptombusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgerymedicine.drugAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
researchProduct

A randomized controlled trial of a power brush/irrigator/mouthrinse routine on plaque and gingivitis reduction in orthodontic patients

2018

ABSTRACT Objectives: To assess plaque and gingivitis reduction in orthodontic patients after 4 weeks' use of an oscillating-rotating power brush, irrigator, and mouthrinse. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized, examiner-blind, clinical trial comparing plaque and gingivitis outcomes for an experimental power brush/irrigator/mouthrinse oral hygiene routine vs a dental prophylaxis followed by regular manual brushing (positive control). Fifty-one participants with fixed orthodontic appliances in the upper and lower jaw and a minimum of 15 gingival bleeding sites were randomly assigned to experimental or positive control treatment. Both groups were instructed to use their products at lea…

business.industrymedicine.medical_treatmentBrushDentistryOrthodontics030206 dentistryOriginal Articleslaw.invention03 medical and health sciencesGingivitis0302 clinical medicineRandomized controlled triallawPower toothbrushMedicine030212 general & internal medicinemedicine.symptombusinessReduction (orthopedic surgery)
researchProduct

Efficacy of 3 toothbrush treatments on plaque removal in orthodontic patients assessed with digital plaque imaging: a randomized controlled trial.

2013

Good oral hygiene is a challenge for orthodontic patients because food readily becomes trapped around the brackets and under the archwires, and appliances are an obstruction to mechanical brushing. The purpose of this study was to compare plaque removal efficacy of 3 toothbrush treatments in orthodontic subjects.This was a replicate-use, single-brushing, 3-treatment, examiner-blind, randomized, 6-period crossover study with washout periods of approximately 24 hours between visits. Forty-six adolescent and young adult patients with fixed orthodontics from a university clinic in Germany were randomized, based on computer-generated randomization, to 1 of 3 treatments: (1) oscillating-rotating …

AdultMaleToothbrushingRandomizationAdolescentPlaque removalElectrical Equipment and SuppliesDental PlaqueDentistryOrthodonticsManual toothbrushlaw.inventionYoung AdultRandomized controlled trialOrthodontic ApplianceslawImage Processing Computer-AssistedMedicineHumansSingle-Blind MethodChildFluorescent DyesOrthodonticsCross-Over Studiesbusiness.industryBrushEquipment DesignCrossover studyTreatment OutcomePhotography DentalPlaque imagingFemaleFluoresceinToothbrushbusinessAmerican journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics
researchProduct