0000000000022235

AUTHOR

Caroline Robert

showing 16 related works from this author

Cemiplimab in locally advanced basal cell carcinoma after hedgehog inhibitor therapy: an open-label, multi-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

2021

Summary Background Before February, 2021, there was no standard treatment regimen for locally advanced basal cell carcinoma after first-line hedgehog inhibitor (HHI) therapy. Cemiplimab, a PD-1 antibody, is approved for treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and has shown clinical activity as monotherapy in first-line non-small-cell lung cancer. Here, we present the primary analysis data of cemiplimab in patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma after HHI therapy. Methods We did an open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial across 38 outpatient clinics, primarily at academic medical centres, in Canada, Europe, and the USA. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years…

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtySkin NeoplasmsPyridinesProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorVismodegibAntibodies Monoclonal Humanized030207 dermatology & venereal diseases03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineInternal medicineAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsmedicineCarcinomaClinical endpointOutpatient clinicHumansBasal cell carcinomaAnilidesHedgehog ProteinsLung cancerImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAgedbusiness.industryStandard treatmentMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseRegimenOncologyCarcinoma Basal CellDrug Resistance Neoplasm030220 oncology & carcinogenesisFemaleNeoplasm Recurrence LocalSettore MED/35 - MALATTIE CUTANEE E VENEREEbusinessmedicine.drugThe Lancet. Oncology
researchProduct

CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells inhibit natural killer cell functions in a transforming growth factor-beta-dependent manner.

2007

Tumor growth promotes the expansion of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T (T reg) cells that counteract T cell–mediated immune responses. An inverse correlation between natural killer (NK) cell activation and T reg cell expansion in tumor-bearing patients, shown here, prompted us to address the role of T reg cells in controlling innate antitumor immunity. Our experiments indicate that human T reg cells expressed membrane-bound transforming growth factor (TGF)–β, which directly inhibited NK cell effector functions and down-regulated NKG2D receptors on the NK cell surface. Adoptive transfer of wild-type T reg cells but not TGF-β−/− T reg cells into nude mice suppressed NK cell–mediated cytotoxicity, redu…

MESH : CytokinesMESH: Flow CytometryMESH : Immunity NaturalMESH: T-LyLymphocyte ActivationT-Lymphocytes RegulatoryMiceInterleukin 210302 clinical medicineT-Lymphocyte SubsetsTransforming Growth Factor betaNeoplasmsMESH : Receptors ImmunologicMESH : Cell ProliferationImmunology and Allergy[ SDV.IMM ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/ImmunologyMESH: AnimalsMESH: NeoplasmsIL-2 receptorReceptors Immunologic0303 health sciencesMESH: Cytokineshemic and immune systemsFlow CytometryNatural killer T cell3. Good healthCell biologyKiller Cells Naturalmedicine.anatomical_structureNK Cell Lectin-Like Receptor Subfamily KInterleukin 12CytokinesReceptors Natural Killer Cell[SDV.IMM]Life Sciences [q-bio]/ImmunologyFranceMESH : Killer Cells NaturalMESH : Cytotoxicity Tests ImmunologicMESH: Killer Cells NaturalMESH: Cell Line TumorMESH : Flow CytometryImmunologychemical and pharmacologic phenomenaMESH: Cytotoxicity Tests ImmunologicMESH : Mice Inbred C57BLBiologyArticleNatural killer cell03 medical and health sciencesMESH: Mice Inbred C57BLCell Line TumorMESH: Cell ProliferationMESH : MicemedicineAnimalsHumansAntigen-presenting cellMESH: Lymphocyte ActivationMESH : FranceMESH: MiceMESH: Receptors ImmunologicMESH : Lymphocyte ActivationCell Proliferation030304 developmental biologyMESH: Immunity NaturalLymphokine-activated killer cellMESH: HumansMESH : Cell Line TumorMESH : HumansCytotoxicity Tests ImmunologicNKG2DMESH : T-LyMESH : NeoplasmsImmunity InnateMice Inbred C57BLMESH: FranceMESH : Animals030215 immunology
researchProduct

A randomized, controlled phase III trial of nab-Paclitaxel versus dacarbazine in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic melanoma.

2015

The efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel versus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma was evaluated in a phase III randomized, controlled trial.Chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IV melanoma received nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks or dacarbazine 1000 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiologic review; the secondary end point was overall survival (OS).A total of 529 patients were randomized to nab-paclitaxel (n = 264) or dacarbazine (n = 265). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. The majority of patients were men (66%), had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 0 (7…

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtySkin NeoplasmsPaclitaxelDacarbazineGastroenterologyDisease-Free Survivallaw.inventionYoung AdultRandomized controlled triallawInternal medicineAlbuminsmedicineClinical endpointHumansProgression-free survivalAntineoplastic Agents AlkylatingMelanomaAgedAged 80 and overbusiness.industryMelanomaHazard ratioHematologyOriginal ArticlesMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseChemotherapy regimenConfidence intervalSurgeryDacarbazineOncologyFemalebusinessmedicine.drugAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
researchProduct

Update on tolerability and overall survival in COLUMBUS: landmark analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial of encorafenib plus binimetinib vs vemurafen…

2020

Abstract Background BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations are established treatments for BRAF V600–mutant melanoma based on demonstrated benefits on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Here, we report an updated analysis of the COLUMBUS (COmbined LGX818 [encorafenib] Used with MEK162 [binimetinib] in BRAF mutant Unresectable Skin cancer) trial with long-term follow-up. Methods In part 1 of the COLUMBUS trial, 577 patients with advanced/metastatic BRAF V600–mutant melanoma, untreated or progressed after first-line immunotherapy, were randomised 1:1:1 to 450 mg of encorafenib QD + 45 mg of binimetinib BID (COMBO450) vs 960 mg of vemurafenib BID (VEM) or 300 mg of encorafenib …

0301 basic medicineOncologyMaleCancer ResearchSkin NeoplasmsMedizinchemistry.chemical_compound0302 clinical medicineAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsOutcome Assessment Health CareMedicine1306 Cancer ResearchVemurafenibMelanomaAged 80 and overSulfonamidesMEK inhibitorMelanomaHazard ratio10177 Dermatology ClinicBinimetinibNauseaMiddle AgedPrognosisOncologyTolerability030220 oncology & carcinogenesis2730 OncologyFemalemedicine.drugAdultDiarrheaProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafmedicine.medical_specialtyVomiting610 Medicine & healthDisease-Free Survival03 medical and health sciencesInternal medicineHumansneoplasmsAgedbusiness.industrymedicine.diseaseConfidence interval030104 developmental biologychemistryVemurafenibMutationBenzimidazolesCarbamatesSkin cancerbusinessEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
researchProduct

Primary Analysis of Phase 2 Results for Cemiplimab in Patients (pts) with Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC) who Progress on or are Intole…

2021

Abstract not available.

business.industryLocally advancedmedicineCancer researchBasal cell carcinomaIn patientmedicine.diseasebusinessHedgehogSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine
researchProduct

Five-year overall survival (OS) in COLUMBUS: A randomized phase 3 trial of encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients…

2021

9507 Background: Combined BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy has demonstrated benefits on progression-free survival (PFS) and OS and is standard of care for the treatment of advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. Here we report a 5-year update from the COLUMBUS trial. Methods: In Part 1 of COLUMBUS, 577 pts with advanced/metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma, untreated or progressed after first-line immunotherapy, were randomized 1:1:1 to encorafenib 450 mg QD + binimetinib 45 mg BID (COMBO450), encorafenib 300 mg QD (ENCO300), or vemurafenib 960 mg BID (VEM). An updated analysis including PFS, OS, objective response rate (ORR; by blinded independent central review), and safety was conducted after min…

OncologyCancer Researchmedicine.medical_specialtybusiness.industryMelanomaMEK inhibitorMutantBinimetinibmedicine.diseasechemistry.chemical_compoundOncologychemistryInternal medicineEncorafenibmedicineOverall survivalIn patientVemurafenibbusinessmedicine.drugJournal of Clinical Oncology
researchProduct

A phase III trial of nab-paclitaxel versus dacarbazine in chemotherapy-naive patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma: Analysis of peripheral neuropat…

2013

e20025 Background: Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a common side effect associated with taxane treatment. In a phase III trial, nab-paclitaxel vs dacarbazine demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival (4.8 vs 2.5 months; P = 0.044) and at the interim survival analysis, a trend toward prolonged overall survival (12.8 vs 10.7 months; P = 0.094) for the treatment of chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic melanoma. Here we report on the PN profile of nab-paclitaxel in this phase III trial. Methods: Pts (median age, 63 years) with chemotherapy-naive stage IV melanoma (M1c stage, 65%; elevated LDH, 28%) and an ECOG performance status 0-1 were randomized to nab-paclita…

OncologyCancer Researchmedicine.medical_specialtyPathologyTaxaneMetastatic melanomaSide effectbusiness.industryDacarbazinemedicine.diseasePeripheral neuropathyOncologyInternal medicinemedicinebusinessChemotherapy naiveNab-paclitaxelmedicine.drugJournal of Clinical Oncology
researchProduct

Overall survival at 5 years of follow-up in a phase III trial comparing ipilimumab 10 mg/kg with 3 mg/kg in patients with advanced melanoma

2020

BackgroundWe have previously reported significantly longer overall survival (OS) with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg versus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in patients with advanced melanoma, with higher incidences of adverse events (AEs) at 10 mg/kg. This follow-up analysis reports a 5-year update of OS and safety.MethodsThis randomized, multicenter, double-blind, phase III trial included patients with untreated or previously treated unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses. The primary end point was OS.ResultsAt a minimum follow-up of 61 months, median OS was 15.7 months (95% CI 11.6 to 17.8) at 10 mg/kg and 11.5 mont…

Cancer Researchmedicine.medical_specialty2435[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]ImmunologyMedizinIpilimumabrandomized trialsGastroenterologyAsymptomaticlaw.inventionimmunology03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineRandomized controlled triallawInternal medicinemedicineClinical endpointImmunology and Allergy1506030212 general & internal medicineAdverse effectRC254-282Clinical/Translational Cancer ImmunotherapyPharmacologybusiness.industryIncidence (epidemiology)MelanomaNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensmedicine.diseaseimmunology; oncology; randomized trials[SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio]Oncology030220 oncology & carcinogenesisoncologyMolecular Medicinemedicine.symptombusinessBrain metastasismedicine.drug
researchProduct

Pimasertib Versus Dacarbazine in Patients With Unresectable NRAS-Mutated Cutaneous Melanoma: Phase II, Randomized, Controlled Trial with Crossover

2020

This study investigated the efficacy and safety of pimasertib (MEK1/MEK2 inhibitor) versus dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with untreated NRAS-mutated melanoma. Phase II, multicenter, open-label trial. Patients with unresectable, stage IIIc/IVM1 NRAS-mutated cutaneous melanoma were randomized 2:1 to pimasertib (60 mg

Cancer ResearchGastroenterologypimasertiblaw.invention0302 clinical medicineRandomized controlled triallawClinical endpoint030212 general & internal medicineMalignant melanomaHazard ratioProgression-free survivalSciences bio-médicales et agricoleslcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens3. Good healthDacarbazineOncology[SDV.SP.PHARMA] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Pharmaceutical sciences/Pharmacology030220 oncology & carcinogenesismedicine.symptomPimasertibmedicine.drugQuality of lifemedicine.medical_specialtyNauseaDacarbazinemalignant melanomadacarbazine[SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/CancerN-(2 3-dihydroxypropyl)-1-((2-fluoro-4-iodophenyl)amino)isonicotinamideNeutropeniaN-(23-dihydroxypropyl)-1-((2-fluoro-4-iodophenyl)amino)isonicotinamidelcsh:RC254-282Article03 medical and health sciences[SDV.CAN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/CancerInternal medicinemedicineProgression-free survivalAdverse effectbusiness.industry[SDV.MHEP.DERM] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Dermatologymedicine.diseaseadverse eventsCancérologiequality of lifeAdverse events[SDV.SP.PHARMA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Pharmaceutical sciences/Pharmacologybusinessprogression-free survival[SDV.MHEP.DERM]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Dermatology
researchProduct

A phase III trial of nab-paclitaxel versus dacarbazine in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic melanoma: A subanalysis based on BRAF status.

2013

9030 Background: Activating mutations of BRAF V600 can be found in 40%-50% of melanomas and are related to poor prognosis. In a phase 3 trial for the treatment of metastatic melanoma (MM) in chemotherapy-naive patients, nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) vs dacarbazine (DTIC) demonstrated a significant improvement in the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by independent radiological review (IRR), and a trend toward prolonged overall survival (OS) at the interim survival analysis. The study also explored the effect of BRAF status on the efficacy parameters. Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IV melanoma (M1c stage 65%; elevated LDH 28%) and ECOG performance statu…

OncologyCancer ResearchPoor prognosismedicine.medical_specialtyMetastatic melanomabusiness.industryDacarbazineOncologyInternal medicinemedicinebusinessneoplasmsChemotherapy naivemedicine.drugNab-paclitaxelJournal of Clinical Oncology
researchProduct

1127P Correlation of BRAF mutation status in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) with tumour biopsy and clinical outcomes in COLUMBUS

2020

chemistry.chemical_compoundOncologymedicine.diagnostic_testchemistrybusiness.industryMutation (genetic algorithm)BiopsyCancer researchMedicineHematologybusinessDNAAnnals of Oncology
researchProduct

Melanoma Clinics and Treatment

2013

GerontologyMetastatic melanomabusiness.industryDacarbazineMutation (genetic algorithm)medicineCancer researchDermatologybusinessChemotherapy naiveNab-paclitaxelmedicine.drugJDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft
researchProduct

A SUMOylation-defective MITF germline mutation predisposes to melanoma and renal carcinoma

2011

International audience; So far, no common environmental and/or phenotypic factor has been associated with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The known risk factors for melanoma include sun exposure, pigmentation and nevus phenotypes; risk factors associated with RCC include smoking, obesity and hypertension. A recent study of coexisting melanoma and RCC in the same patients supports a genetic predisposition underlying the association between these two cancers. The microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) has been proposed to act as a melanoma oncogene; it also stimulates the transcription of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF1A), the pathway of which is targeted by kidney canc…

multidisciplinary sciencesMESH : Germ-Line MutationSUMO proteinurologic and male genital diseasesmedicine.disease_causeMESH : Neoplasm Invasiveness[ SDV.CAN ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/CancerMESH : Carcinoma Renal Cell0302 clinical medicineGene FrequencyCell MovementMESH: Germ-Line MutationMESH : Cell MovementMESH : Gene FrequencyMESH: Cell MovementComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSGenetics0303 health sciencesMultidisciplinaryMESH: SumoylationMelanomaMESH : SumoylationMESH: Genetic Predisposition to Diseaserenal carcinomaMESH: Carcinoma Renal CellMicrophthalmia-associated transcription factorMESH : Microphthalmia-Associated Transcription Factor3. Good healthgermline mutation030220 oncology & carcinogenesisMESH: Microphthalmia-Associated Transcription Factorscience and technologyMESH: MelanomasumoMESH : Melanoma[SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/CancerBiology03 medical and health sciencesGermline mutationmelanomaMESH: Gene FrequencyGenetic predispositionmedicineHumansGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseNeoplasm InvasivenessCarcinoma Renal CellneoplasmsTranscription factorGerm-Line Mutation030304 developmental biologyMicrophthalmia-Associated Transcription FactorMESH: HumansMESH : HumansSumoylationMESH: Neoplasm Invasivenessmedicine.diseaseHIF1Acancer cellsCancer researchMESH : Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseCarcinogenesis
researchProduct

Encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF -mutant melanoma (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomis…

2017

Summary Background Combined BRAF-MEK inhibitor therapy is the standard of care for BRAF V600 -mutant advanced melanoma. We investigated encorafenib, a BRAF inhibitor with unique target-binding properties, alone or in combination with the MEK inhibitor binimetinib, versus vemurafenib in patients with advanced BRAF V600 -mutant melanoma. Methods COLUMBUS was conducted as a two-part, randomised, open-label phase 3 study at 162 hospitals in 28 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had histologically confirmed locally advanced (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV), unresectable or metastatic cutaneous melanoma, or unknown primary melanoma; a B…

AdultMaleProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf0301 basic medicineOncologymedicine.medical_specialtySkin NeoplasmsTime FactorsPhases of clinical researchYoung Adult03 medical and health scienceschemistry.chemical_compound0302 clinical medicineInternal medicineAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers TumormedicineHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyProgression-free survivalVemurafenibMelanomaProtein Kinase InhibitorsAgedAged 80 and overSulfonamidesPerformance statusbusiness.industryMelanomaMEK inhibitorBinimetinibMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseProgression-Free Survival030104 developmental biologyVemurafenibOncologyTolerabilitychemistry030220 oncology & carcinogenesisMutationBenzimidazolesFemaleCarbamatesbusinessmedicine.drugThe Lancet Oncology
researchProduct

Overall survival in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma receiving encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib (COLUMBUS): a multice…

2018

Summary Background Encorafenib plus binimetinib and encorafenib alone improved progression-free survival compared with vemurafenib in patients with BRAF V600 -mutant melanoma in the COLUMBUS trial. Here, we report the results of the secondary endpoint of overall survival. Methods COLUMBUS was a two-part, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study done at 162 hospitals in 28 countries. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years with histologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic cutaneous melanoma, or unknown primary melanoma, BRAF V600E or BRAF V600K mutation, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and were treatment naive or had pr…

Male0301 basic medicineOncologySkin NeoplasmsTime FactorsMedizinPhases of clinical researchGene mutationchemistry.chemical_compound0302 clinical medicineAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsVemurafenibMelanomaAged 80 and overTrametinibSulfonamides10177 Dermatology ClinicBinimetinibMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalPhenotypeOncologyTolerability030220 oncology & carcinogenesisDisease ProgressionFemale2730 Oncologymedicine.drugAdultProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafmedicine.medical_specialty610 Medicine & healthYoung Adult03 medical and health sciencesInternal medicineBiomarkers TumormedicineHumansGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseProgression-free survivalProtein Kinase InhibitorsAgedPerformance statusbusiness.industry030104 developmental biologyVemurafenibchemistryMutationBenzimidazolesCarbamatesbusinessThe Lancet Oncology
researchProduct

Adverse events associated with encorafenib plus binimetinib in the COLUMBUS study: incidence, course and management.

2019

Abstract Background Dual inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway with BRAF/MEK inhibitor (BRAFi/MEKi) therapy is a standard treatment for BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma and has historically been associated with grade III pyrexia or photosensitivity depending on the combination used. The objective of this study was to fully describe adverse events from the COLUMBUS study evaluating the most recent BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination encorafenib+binimetinib. Patients and methods Patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma were randomised to receive encorafenib 450 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg twice daily, encorafenib 300 mg on…

Encorafenib0301 basic medicineOncologyMaleCancer ResearchSkin NeoplasmsBinimetinib; Encorafenib; Melanoma; Safety; Vemurafenib;MedizinBinimetinibchemistry.chemical_compound0302 clinical medicineAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols1306 Cancer ResearchVemurafenibMelanomaFatigueeducation.field_of_studySulfonamidesMEK inhibitorMelanomaStandard treatmentIncidence10177 Dermatology ClinicBinimetinibNauseaMiddle AgedOncology030220 oncology & carcinogenesis2730 OncologyFemaleSafetyMitogen-Activated Protein Kinasesmedicine.drugProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafmedicine.medical_specialtyVomitingPopulation610 Medicine & health03 medical and health sciencesInternal medicinemedicineHumanseducationAdverse effectProtein Kinase Inhibitorsbusiness.industrymedicine.diseaseDiscontinuation030104 developmental biologychemistryVemurafenibMutationBenzimidazolesCarbamatesbusinessEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
researchProduct