0000000000077546

AUTHOR

Michel-ange Amorim

0000-0002-8455-1437

showing 2 related works from this author

Intercepting real and simulated falling objects: what is the difference?

2009

International audience; The use of virtual reality is nowadays common in many studies in the field of human perception and movement control, particularly in interceptive actions. However, the ecological validity of the simulation is often taken for granted without having been formally established. If participants were to perceive the real situation and its virtual equivalent in a different fashion, the generalization of the results obtained in virtual reality to real life would be highly questionable. We tested the ecological validity of virtual reality in this context by comparing the timing of interceptive actions based upon actually falling objects and their simulated counterparts. The r…

MaleTime Factorsmedia_common.quotation_subjectMotion PerceptionVirtual realityMotor Activity050105 experimental psychology03 medical and health sciencesUser-Computer InterfaceYoung Adult0302 clinical medicineHuman–computer interactionPerceptionPsychophysicsHumans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesComputer SimulationSimulationMovement controlmedia_commonAnalysis of Variance[SCCO.NEUR]Cognitive science/NeuroscienceGeneral Neuroscience05 social sciencesFalling ObjectsBiomechanical PhenomenaFemalePsychology030217 neurology & neurosurgeryPsychomotor PerformanceJournal of neuroscience methods
researchProduct

Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: Evidence against dissociation.

1992

International audience; Two experiments examined the relation between explicit knowledge and motor performance on the serial reaction time task developed by Nissen and Bullemer (1987). Tests of free recall and recognition of sequence components revealed that reliable explicit knowledge was acquired after an amount of practice that was hardly sufficient to improve mean motor performance. In addition, reaction time improvement was limited to the ending trials of the 3- and 4-trial sequence components that Ss recalled or recognized. These results were replicated in Experiment 3, in which Ss were trained under attentional distraction in the task developed by Cohen, Ivry, and Keele (1990). Overa…

AdultMaleLinguistics and Language[SCCO.NEUR]Cognitive science/Neuroscience[SCCO.NEUR] Cognitive science/Neuroscience05 social sciencesExperimental and Cognitive PsychologySerial Learning050105 experimental psychologyLanguage and Linguistics03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineOrientationMental Recall[ SCCO.NEUR ] Cognitive science/NeuroscienceReaction TimeHumansAttentionFemale0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesProbability LearningPsychomotor Performance030217 neurology & neurosurgeryJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
researchProduct