0000000000129487

AUTHOR

Tomas Pärt

0000-0001-7388-6672

showing 2 related works from this author

Weak effects of geolocators on small birds: A meta-analysis controlled for phylogeny and publication bias

2020

Abstract Currently, the deployment of tracking devices is one of the most frequently used approaches to study movement ecology of birds. Recent miniaturization of light‐level geolocators enabled studying small bird species whose migratory patterns were widely unknown. However, geolocators may reduce vital rates in tagged birds and may bias obtained movement data. There is a need for a thorough assessment of the potential tag effects on small birds, as previous meta‐analyses did not evaluate unpublished data and impact of multiple life‐history traits, focused mainly on large species and the number of published studies tagging small birds has increased substantially. We quantitatively reviewe…

0106 biological sciencesZOOLOGIAFuture studiesSurvivalAnimal Ecology and PhysiologyLEG-LOOP HARNESSESTag effect01 natural sciences//purl.org/becyt/ford/1 [https]TRACKINGWINTERING AREASROUTESgeolocator GeoLight FLightR migration annual schedules precisionReturn ratePhylogenyMigrationcondition ; migration ; phenology ; reproduction ; return rate ; survival ; tracking device ; tag effectHIRUNDO-RUSTICAMatched controlReproductionGeoLightATTACHMENTgeolocationPhenologyMeta-analysis1181 Ecology evolutionary biologyMIGRATORY CONNECTIVITYSONGBIRDgeolocatorSeasonsCIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTASSTRATEGIEStracking methodsZoologyBiology010603 evolutionary biologyBirdsCiencias BiológicasPhylogeneticsFLightRAnimals//purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 [https]ConditionEcology Evolution Behavior and SystematicsANNUAL CYCLETracking device010604 marine biology & hydrobiologyPlant EcologyQHPublication biasEcologíabiology.organism_classificationSongbirdGeolocationannual schedulesAnimal Science and ZoologyAnimal MigrationprecisionVital ratesPublication Bias
researchProduct

Improving scientific rigour in conservation evaluations and a plea deal for transparency on potential biases

2020

Abstract The delivery of rigorous and unbiased evidence on the effects of interventions lay at the heart of the scientific method. Here we examine scientific papers evaluating agri‐environment schemes, the principal instrument to mitigate farmland biodiversity declines worldwide. Despite previous warnings about rudimentary study designs in this field, we found that the majority of studies published between 2008 and 2017 still lack robust study designs to strictly evaluate intervention effects. Potential sources of bias that arise from the correlative nature are rarely mentioned, and results are still promoted by using a causal language. This lack of robust study designs likely results from …

0106 biological sciencesagri‐environment schemelcsh:QH1-199.5Psychological interventionIntervention effectlcsh:General. Including nature conservation geographical distribution010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesRigourPleaorganic farmingbefore after control impactVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Basale biofag: 470Ecology Evolution Behavior and SystematicsNature and Landscape ConservationEcology010604 marine biology & hydrobiologyClinical study designevaluation of conservation interventionsPrincipal (computer security)biodiversity | causal languageRisk analysis (engineering)meta‐analysisMeta-analysisTransparency (graphic)PsychologyConservation Letters
researchProduct