0000000000140881

AUTHOR

Rui Diogo

showing 5 related works from this author

Anatomical Network Comparison of Human Upper and Lower, Newborn and Adult, and Normal and Abnormal Limbs, with Notes on Development, Pathology and Li…

2015

How do the various anatomical parts (modules) of the animal body evolve into very different integrated forms (integration) yet still function properly without decreasing the individual’s survival? This long-standing question remains unanswered for multiple reasons, including lack of consensus about conceptual definitions and approaches, as well as a reasonable bias toward the study of hard tissues over soft tissues. A major difficulty concerns the non-trivial technical hurdles of addressing this problem, specifically the lack of quantitative tools to quantify and compare variation across multiple disparate anatomical parts and tissue types. In this paper we apply for the first time a powerf…

Pathologymedicine.medical_specialtyScienceSerial homologyBiologyBone and BonesUpper ExtremitymedicineAnimalsHumansMuscle SkeletalSpatial organizationModularity (networks)MultidisciplinaryQAbnormal limbsRSoft tissueAnatomyToesBiological EvolutionCartilagemedicine.anatomical_structureLower ExtremityEvolutionary developmental biologyUpper limbMedicineTissue compositionResearch Article
researchProduct

Anatomical networks reveal the musculoskeletal modularity of the human head

2015

AbstractMosaic evolution is a key mechanism that promotes robustness and evolvability in living beings. For the human head, to have a modular organization would imply that each phenotypic module could grow and function semi-independently. Delimiting the boundaries of head modules and even assessing their existence, is essential to understand human evolution. Here we provide the first study of the human head using anatomical network analysis (AnNA), offering the most complete overview of the modularity of the head to date. Our analysis integrates the many biological dependences that tie hard and soft tissues together, arising as a consequence of development, growth, stresses and loads and mo…

Models AnatomicMosaic evolutionBiologyArticle03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineHumansMusculoskeletal System030304 developmental biologyNetwork modelCognitive science0303 health sciencesFacial expressionMultidisciplinaryHuman headbusiness.industryRobustness (evolution)AnatomyModular designBiological EvolutionEvolvabilityPhenotypebusinessHead030217 neurology & neurosurgeryNetwork analysisScientific Reports
researchProduct

Anatomical Network Analysis of Primate Skull Morphology

2015

Borja Esteve-Altava1,3, Julia Boughner2, Rui Diogo3 and Diego Rasskin-Gutman1. 1Theoretical Biology Research Group, Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity & Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. 2Anatomy & Cell Biology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. 3Anatomy, Howard University, Washington, DC USA. boresal@gmail.com, diego.rasskin@uv.es, julia.boughner@gmail.com, rui.diogo@howard.edu

biologyEvolutionary biologybiology.animalGeneticsSkull morphologyPrimateMolecular BiologyBiochemistryBiotechnologyThe FASEB Journal
researchProduct

Anatomical Network Analysis Shows Decoupling of Modular Lability and Complexity in the Evolution of the Primate Skull

2015

Modularity and complexity go hand in hand in the evolution of the skull of primates. Because analyses of these two parameters often use different approaches, we do not know yet how modularity evolves within, or as a consequence of, an also-evolving complex organization. Here we use a novel network theory-based approach (Anatomical Network Analysis) to assess how the organization of skull bones constrains the co-evolution of modularity and complexity among primates. We used the pattern of bone contacts modeled as networks to identify connectivity modules and quantify morphological complexity. We analyzed whether modularity and complexity evolved coordinately in the skull of primates. Specifi…

PrimatesScienceZoologyNetwork theoryBiologymedicineAnimalsPhylogenyCognitive scienceModularity (networks)MultidisciplinaryFunctional integration (neurobiology)business.industrySkullQRModular designBiological EvolutionConstraint (information theory)EvolvabilitySkullmedicine.anatomical_structureEvolutionary developmental biologyMedicinebusinessResearch ArticlePLOS ONE
researchProduct

Dinosaurs, chameleons, humans, and evo-devo path: linking Étienne Geoffroy's teratology, Waddington's homeorhesis, Alberch's logic of "monsters," and…

2017

23 pages; International audience; Since the rise of evo-devo (evolutionary developmental biology) in the 1980s, few authors have attempted to combine the increasing knowledge obtained from the study of model organisms and human medicine with data from comparative anatomy and evolutionary biology in order to investigate the links between development, pathology, and macroevolution. Fortunately, this situation is slowly changing, with a renewed interest in evolutionary developmental pathology (evo-devo-path) in the past decades, as evidenced by the idea to publish this special, and very timely, issue on "Developmental Evolution in Biomedical Research." As all of us have recently been involved,…

0301 basic medicinemedia_common.quotation_subjectMacroevolutionBiologyDinosaurs03 medical and health sciencesHuman medicineGeneticsAnimalsHumansEcology Evolution Behavior and Systematicsmedia_commonTeratologyHomeorhesisLizardsBiological Evolution3. Good healthEpistemologyAnatomy Comparative030104 developmental biology[ SDV.BID.EVO ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE]Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary developmental biologyMolecular MedicineAnimal Science and ZoologyDevelopmental psychopathologyDevelopmental BiologyDiversity (politics)
researchProduct