0000000000243772

AUTHOR

Alexander Ruser

0000-0002-5688-2589

showing 7 related works from this author

A Mission for MARS: The Success of Climate Change Skeptic Rhetoric in the US

2020

Radio and television broadcasters accuse climate scientists of “promoting a global warming hoax”, recommending that they be “named and fi red, drawn and quartered” (Rush Limbaugh); commit “hara kiri” (Glenn Beck); and be “publicly flogged” (Mark Morano). Conservative media are crucial in promoting climate skepticism. Likewise, climate skepticism resonates well with white middle-class men. But why does the middle class continue to support “radical” positions? This article focuses on Anti-Intellectualism to explain why climate skeptic rhetoric resonates with “Middle American Radicals” (MARS).

050101 languages & linguisticsLinguistics and LanguageWhite (horse)Middle classHoaxCommunicationmedia_common.quotation_subject05 social sciencesGlobal warmingClimate changeEnvironmental ethics02 engineering and technologyCommitLanguage and Linguisticslcsh:Social Scienceslcsh:HPolitical scienceRhetoric0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineeringVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200020201 artificial intelligence & image processing0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesmedia_commonSkepticism
researchProduct

Examining Open Innovation in Science (OIS): what Open Innovation can and cannot offer the science of science

2021

Scholars across disciplines increasingly hear calls for more open andcollaborative approaches to scientific research. The concept of OpenInnovation in Science (OIS) provides a framework that integratesdispersed research efforts aiming to understand the antecedents,contingencies, and consequences of applying open and collaborativeresearch practices. While the OIS framework has already been taken upby science of science scholars, its conceptual underpinnings requirefurther specification. In this essay, we critically examine the OIS conceptand bring to light two key aspects: 1) how OIS builds upon OpenInnovation (OI) research by adopting its attention to boundary-crossingknowledge flows and by…

organizationsknowledgeOpen innovationknowledge flowsperspectiveKnowledge flowsexplorationScientific researchVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Sosiologi: 220Boundariesabsorptive-capacityOpen InnovationVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210science of scienceOpen Innovation in ScienceManagement of Technology and Innovationopen scienceScience of sciencescientific researchBoundary crossingvalue captureOpen scienceboundariesboundary crossingOpen innovation in science
researchProduct

Corporealising a Healthy Democracy? Inequality, Bodies and Participation

2019

Socio-economic inequality is associated with differentiated levels of health and poor health affects political participation; inequalities are embodied in political life. This contribution, focusin...

021110 strategic defence & security studiesSociology and Political ScienceInequalitymedia_common.quotation_subject05 social sciences0211 other engineering and technologies02 engineering and technologyDeliberationDemocracy0506 political sciencePoliticsEmbodied cognitionPolitical sciencePolitical economy050602 political science & public administrationmedia_commonRepresentation
researchProduct

What Counts in the Politics of Climate Change? Science, Scepticism and Emblematic Numbers

2019

Scientific data is frequently presented in climate policy in the form of targets, thresholds and other “emblematic numbers”. Emblematic numbers provide putatively accurate, easily graspable units of comparison. Their use, however, belies the complexity of climate change and scientific data and threatens to mask the political decisions that operate behind them. Those interested in disrupting policymaking are able to expose and exploit this masked politicisation. This contribution unpicks the ambiguous politics of emblematic numbers. A Qualitative Content Analysis of the 2015 NIPCC report reveals the tactics of a climate change denial organisation to target the politics behind “97%” and “95%”…

DilemmaPoliticsExploitmedia_common.quotation_subjectPolitical scienceClimate change denialClimate change scienceClimate changeEnvironmental ethicsScientific evidenceSkepticismmedia_common
researchProduct

The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach

2020

Openness and collaboration in scientific research are attracting increasing attention from scholars and practitioners alike. However, a common understanding of these phenomena is hindered by disciplinary boundaries and disconnected research streams. We link dispersed knowledge on Open Innovation, Open Science, and related concepts such as Responsible Research and Innovation by proposing a unifying Open Innovation in Science (OIS) Research Framework. This framework captures the antecedents, contingencies, and consequences of open and collaborative practices along the entire process of generating and disseminating scientific insights and translating them into innovation. Moreover, it elucidat…

Open scienceTRIPLE-HELIXKnowledge managementEconomicscollaboration in scienceSPIN-OFFSSocial SciencesOpennessInterdisciplinary researchQ1ResearchInstitutes_Networks_Beacons/manchester_institute_of_innovation_researchOpen ScienceBusiness & EconomicsManagement of Technology and InnovationPUBLIC ENGAGEMENTBusinessSociologyPublic engagement/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/industry_innovation_and_infrastructureOPEN ACCESSOpen innovation05 social sciencesACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIPL1Management1503 Business and ManagementManchester Institute of Innovation Researchinterdisciplinary researchVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200Open Innovation in Science openness collaboration in science Open Science interdisciplinary researchSDG 9 - IndustryDisciplineopennessTEAM COMPOSITION050905 science studiesUNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER0502 economics and businessTRANSFER OFFICESDispersed knowledgeInnovationTeam compositionGENDER-DIFFERENCESResponsible Research and Innovationbusiness.industryGeneral Business Management and AccountingBusiness & ManagementConceptual frameworkOpen Innovation in Scienceand InfrastructureSDG 9 - Industry Innovation and Infrastructure0509 other social sciencesCollaboration in sciencebusiness050203 business & management
researchProduct

From Gamble to Conformity? Academic Careers, Ethical Neutrality and the Role of ‘Professional’ Social Sciences

2019

Max Weber´s sober inventory of academic life and his prophetic vision of its ‘Americanization’ highlight the impact of societies on scientific knowledge production and academic careers. Likewise, W...

Sociology of scientific knowledgemedia_common.quotation_subject05 social sciencesAmericanizationGeneral Social Sciences06 humanities and the arts050905 science studies0603 philosophy ethics and religionConformityProfessionalizationPhilosophy060302 philosophyProduction (economics)SociologyNeutrality0509 other social sciencesSocial sciencemedia_commonSocial Epistemology
researchProduct

Kopfarbeit für die Gesellschaft oder die „Gesellschaft im Kopf“. Klimaexperten, Klimaleugner und die Aktualität der Heidelberger Kontroverse um die g…

2021

„Experten im (…) ublichen Verstandnis – als Bezeichnung eines ‚Sachverstandigen‘ (ursprunglich im 19. Jahrhundert: vor Gericht) – weisen sich als Experten aus insbesondere uber Zertifikate, die ihnen Kompetenzen (Kenntnisse und Fahigkeiten) bescheinigen, welche sie sich uber eine relativ voraussetzungsvolle, lang dauernde und inhaltlich umfangreiche Ausbildung – in typischerweise ‚offentlichen‘ Einrichtungen – erworben haben“ (Hitzler 1994, S. 14).

researchProduct