0000000000306656

AUTHOR

Edy Fantinato

showing 3 related works from this author

Fine‐grain beta diversity of Palaearctic grassland vegetation

2021

QUESTIONS: Which environmental factors influence fine-grain beta diversity of vegetation and do they vary among taxonomic groups? LOCATION: Palaearctic biogeographic realm. METHODS: We extracted 4,654 nested-plot series with at least four different grain sizes between 0.0001 m² and 1,024 m² from the GrassPlot database, covering a wide range of different grassland and other open habitat types. We derived extensive environmental and structural information for these series. For each series and four taxonomic groups (vascular plants, bryophytes, lichens, all), we calculated the slope parameter (z-value) of the power law species–area relationship (SAR), as a beta diversity measure. We tested whe…

0106 biological sciencesCzechAgriculture and Food SciencesFine grainelevation333.7: Landflächen NaturerholungsgebietehabitatPlant ScienceMaster planFine-grain beta diversity01 natural sciencesScale dependenceevolutionaryRICHNESSvascular plantsHABITATMacroecologyComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSmedia_commonMean occupancyProductivity2. Zero hungerdisturbance0303 health sciencesEcologySettore BIO/02 - Botanica SistematicaEnvironmental researchPalaearctic grasslanddifferentiationenvironmental heterogeneityspecies-area relationship (SAR)gradientDIFFERENTIATION580: Pflanzen (Botanik)disturbance; elevation; fine-grain beta diversity; heterogeneity; land use; macroecology; mean occupancy; Palaearctic grassland; productivity; scale dependence; species–area relationship (SAR); z-valuescale dependencelanguagemacroecologyproductivitymedia_common.quotation_subjectmean occupancyLibrary scienceSpecies–area relationship (SAR)Environmental drivers Grasslands Lichens Mosses Species-area relationship SAR Vascular Plands010603 evolutionary biologySpecies-area curve03 medical and health sciencesspecies–area relationship (SAR)ExcellencePolitical scienceGRADIENTSlovak030304 developmental biologyspatial scalefine-grain beta diversityBiology and Life Sciencesland useDisturbance15. Life on landZ-valuelanguage.human_languageENVIRONMENTAL HETEROGENEITYEarth and Environmental Sciencesz-valueElevationLand useEVOLUTIONARYSPATIAL SCALESPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIPSVASCULAR PLANTS[SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and EcologyheterogeneityHeterogeneityrichness
researchProduct

Shedding light on typical species: Implications for habitat monitoring

2021

Habitat monitoring in Europe is regulated by Article 17 of the Habitats Directive, which suggests the use of typical species to assess habitat conservation status. Yet, the Directive uses the term “typical” species but does not provide a definition, either for its use in reporting or for its use in impact assessments. To address the issue, an online workshop was organized by the Italian Society for Vegetation Science (SISV) to shed light on the diversity of perspectives regarding the different concepts of typical species, and to discuss the possible implications for habitat monitoring. To this aim, we inquired 73 people with a very different degree of expertise in the field of veget…

Structure and functiondiagnostic and characteristic species habitat monitoring keystone species Natura 2000 plant community structure and functions typical species 92/43/EEC DirectiveKeystone specieSettore BIO/02 - Botanica SistematicaTypical speciesPlant cultureDiagnostic and characteristic speciesPlant communitySB1-1110Diagnostic and characteristic specie92/43/EEC Directive; Diagnostic and characteristic species; Habitat monitoring; Keystone species; Natura 2000; Plant community; Structure and functions; Typical speciesKeystone species92/43/EEC DirectiveStructure and functionsHabitat monitoringNatura 2000QK900-989Plant ecologySettore BIO/03 - Botanica Ambientale e Applicata
researchProduct

Species–area relationships in continuous vegetation: Evidence from Palaearctic grasslands

2019

Aim Species-area relationships (SARs) are fundamental scaling laws in ecology although their shape is still disputed. At larger areas, power laws best represent SARs. Yet, it remains unclear whether SARs follow other shapes at finer spatial grains in continuous vegetation. We asked which function describes SARs best at small grains and explored how sampling methodology or the environment influence SAR shape. Location Palaearctic grasslands and other non-forested habitats. Taxa Vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens. Methods We used the GrassPlot database, containing standardized vegetation-plot data from vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens spanning a wide range of grassland types throu…

curvesshapesspecies– area relationship (SAR)Michaelis–Menten functionBiomeGrasslandVegetation typelogarithmic functionTaxonomic rankLichenNested‐plot Samplinggeography.geographical_feature_categorypower lawEcologyVDP::Landbruks- og Fiskerifag: 900biologyEcologySettore BIO/02 - Botanica SistematicaPalaearctic grasslandspecies-area relationship (SAR)Grasslandddc:nonlinear regressionscale dependenceMichaelis–Menten Functionlogarithmic function; Michaelis–Menten function; minimal area; nested-plot sampling; nonlinear regression; Palaearctic grassland; plant biodiversity; power law; scaling law; species–area relationship (SAR)environmentnested‐plot sampling570Evolutionscaling lawSpecies-area relationshipminimal areadiversityspecies–area relationship (SAR)Behavior and Systematicsspecies- area relationship (SAR)ddc:570577: Ökologienested-plot samplingEcology Evolution Behavior and Systematics580geographymodelfungiBiology and Life Sciences500Species diversityPlant communitySpecies–area Relationship (SAR)Earth and Environmental SciencesMichaelis-Menten functionplant biodiversitySpecies richnessrichness
researchProduct