0000000000344997

AUTHOR

Asher Berlin

0000-0002-1156-1482

showing 4 related works from this author

The First Three Seconds: a Review of Possible Expansion Histories of the Early Universe

2020

It is commonly assumed that the energy density of the Universe was dominated by radiation between reheating after inflation and the onset of matter domination 54,000 years later. While the abundance of light elements indicates that the Universe was radiation dominated during Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN), there is scant evidence that the Universe was radiation dominated prior to BBN. It is therefore possible that the cosmological history was more complicated, with deviations from the standard radiation domination during the earliest epochs. Indeed, several interesting proposals regarding various topics such as the generation of dark matter, matter-antimatter asymmetry, gravitational waves,…

High Energy Physics - TheoryCosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)reheatingmedia_common.quotation_subjectnucleosynthesis: big bangDark matterFOS: Physical sciencesPrimordial black holeGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)01 natural sciencesCosmologyGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmologydark matterGeneral Relativity and Quantum CosmologyHigh Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)Big Bang nucleosynthesis0103 physical sciencesenergy: density010306 general physicsmedia_commonInflation (cosmology)Physics010308 nuclear & particles physicsGravitational wave[PHYS.HTHE]Physics [physics]/High Energy Physics - Theory [hep-th]gravitational radiationAstronomyUniverseinflation: modelBaryogenesisHigh Energy Physics - PhenomenologyHigh Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)[PHYS.HPHE]Physics [physics]/High Energy Physics - Phenomenology [hep-ph][PHYS.GRQC]Physics [physics]/General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology [gr-qc]history[PHYS.ASTR]Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph]black hole: primordialasymmetryAstrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
researchProduct

Erratum to: Hadron transverse momentum distributions in muon deep inelastic scattering at 160 GeV/ $$c$$ c

2015

Author(s): Adolph, C; Alekseev, MG; Alexakhin, VY; Alexandrov, Y; Alexeev, GD; Amoroso, A; Andrieux, V; Austregesilo, A; Badelek, B; Balestra, F; Barth, J; Baum, G; Bedfer, Y; Berlin, A; Bernhard, J; Bertini, R; Bicker, K; Bieling, J; Birsa, R; Bisplinghoff, J; Boer, M; Bordalo, P; Bradamante, F; Braun, C; Bravar, A; Bressan, A; Buchele, M; Burtin, E; Capozza, L; Chiosso, M; Chung, SU; Cicuttin, A; Crespo, ML; Dalla Torre, S; Dasgupta, SS; Dasgupta, S; Denisov, OY; Donskov, SV; Doshita, N; Duic, V; Dunnweber, W; Dziewiecki, M; Efremov, A; Elia, C; Eversheim, PD; Eyrich, W; Faessler, M; Ferrero, A; Filin, A; Finger, M; Finger Jr, M; Fischer, H; Franco, C; du Fresne von Hohenesche, N; Friedri…

Nuclear physicsPhysicsMuonPhysics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)010308 nuclear & particles physics0103 physical sciencesHadronTransverse momentum010306 general physicsDeep inelastic scattering53001 natural sciencesEngineering (miscellaneous)The European Physical Journal C
researchProduct

Toward (finally!) ruling out Z and Higgs mediated dark matter models

2016

In recent years, direct detection, indirect detection, and collider experiments have placed increasingly stringent constraints on particle dark matter, exploring much of the parameter space associated with the WIMP paradigm. In this paper, we focus on the subset of WIMP models in which the dark matter annihilates in the early universe through couplings to either the Standard Model $Z$ or the Standard Model Higgs boson. Considering fermionic, scalar, and vector dark matter candidates within a model-independent context, we find that the overwhelming majority of these dark matter candidates are already ruled out by existing experiments. In the case of $Z$ mediated dark matter, the only scenari…

Particle physicsCosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)Physics beyond the Standard Modelmedia_common.quotation_subjectDark matterScalar (mathematics)FOS: Physical sciencesAstrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics7. Clean energy01 natural sciencesStandard ModelHigh Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)WIMP0103 physical sciences010306 general physicsmedia_commonPhysics010308 nuclear & particles physicsHigh Energy Physics::PhenomenologyAstronomy and AstrophysicsUniversePseudoscalarHigh Energy Physics - PhenomenologyHiggs bosonHigh Energy Physics::ExperimentAstrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic AstrophysicsJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
researchProduct

Corrigendum to “Odd and even partial waves of ηπ− and η′π− in π−p → η(′)π−p at 191 GeV/c” [Phys. Lett. B 740 (2015) 303–311]

2020

Abstract In Fig. 5 on p. 311 of our Phys. Lett. B 740 (2015) 303 an adjustment by 180 ∘ is required for the phases with respect to the L = 2 , M = 1 wave, of the following waves: L = 1 , 3 , 5 with M = 1 , and L = 2 with M = 2 . After this correction (Fig. 5 (corrected) below), the extracted partial waves describe the angular distribution of the η ( ′ ) in the Gottfried-Jackson (GJ) frame, using Eq. (4) with implicit Condon-Shortley phase convention. The other results of our paper are not affected. The right-handed GJ coordinate system was defined by the z-axis pointing in the direction of the beam in the η ( ′ ) π − center-of-mass system and the y-axis pointing in the direction of p recoil…

PhysicsNuclear and High Energy PhysicsAngular distributionRecoilCoordinate systemPhase (waves)Atomic physicsBeam (structure)lcsh:Physicslcsh:QC1-999Physics Letters B
researchProduct