0000000000414651
AUTHOR
Marco Imperatori
Cetuximab rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: how to come away from acquired resistance?
Background: Scientific data provide the evidence that secondary K-RAS mutations do not occur during anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy in colorectal cancer patients. This multicenter phase II prospective study aims to investigate the activity of a retreatment with a cetuximab-based therapy. Patients and methods: We enrolled 39 irinotecan-refractory patients who had a clinical benefit after a line of cetuximab- plus irinotecan-based therapy and then a progression of disease for which underwent a new line chemotherapy and finally, after a clear new progression of disease, were retreated with the same cetuximab- plus irinotecan-based therapy. Results: Median number of therapeutic li…
Corrections to “Cetuximab rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: how to come away from acquired resistance?”
Nessuno
Prognostic clinical factors in patients affected by non-small-cell lung cancer receiving Nivolumab
Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors have radically changed the treatment landscape of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). It is still unclear whether specific clinical characteristics might identify those patients benefiting from immunotherapy more than others. The aim of this study was to identify clinical characteristics associated with disease-specific survival (DSS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), objective responses (OR) and progressive disease (PD) in NSCLC patients treated with Nivolumab. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective study conducted on 294 patients treated with Nivolumab for advanced NSCLC. Results: Of the more than 50 variables analyzed, five showed a signifi…
Prognostic significance of K-Ras mutation rate in metastatic colorectal cancer patients
// Bruno Vincenzi 1 , Chiara Cremolini 2 , Andrea Sartore-Bianchi 3 , Antonio Russo 4 , Francesco Mannavola 5 , Giuseppe Perrone 6 , Francesco Pantano 1 , Fotios Loupakis 2 , Daniele Rossini 2 , Elena Ongaro 7 , Erica Bonazzina 3 , Emanuela Dell’Aquila 1 , Marco Imperatori 1 , Alice Zoccoli 1 , Giuseppe Bronte 4 , Giovanna De Maglio 7 , Gabriella Fontanini 8 , Clara Natoli 9 , Alfredo Falcone 2 , Daniele Santini 1 , Andrea Onetti-Muda 6 , Salvatore Siena 3 , Giuseppe Tonini 1 and Giuseppe Aprile 7 1 Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy 2 Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy 3 Niguarda Cancer Center, Osped…
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), and Outcomes with Nivolumab in Pretreated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Large Retrospective Multicenter Study
Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have provided substantial benefit in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with unprecedented results in terms of survival. However, the identification of reliable predictive biomarkers to these agents is lacking and multiple clinicopathological factors have been evaluated. The aim of this study was to analyze the potential role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in patients with pretreated NSCLC receiving nivolumab. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study involving 14 Italian centers, evaluating the role of some laboratory results in patients with NSCLC treat…
Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Platelet-To-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), and Outcomes With Nivolumab in Pretreated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Large Retrospective Multicenter Study
Provide enhanced digital features for this article This Figshare page contains a Summary Slide. If you are an author of this publication and would like to provide additional enhanced digital features for your article then please contact adisrapidplus@springer.com. The journal offers a range of additional features designed to increase visibility and readership. All features will be thoroughly peer reviewed to ensure the content is of the highest scientific standard and all features are marked as ‘peer reviewed’ to ensure readers are aware that the content has been reviewed to the same level as the articles they are being presented alongside. Moreover, all sponsorship and disclosure informati…