0000000000452746

AUTHOR

Luca Bailo

showing 4 related works from this author

Sexism Interacts with Patient–Physician Gender Concordance in Influencing Patient Control Preferences: Findings from a Vignette Experimental Design

2020

Background: Patient preferences regarding their involvement in shared treatments decisions is fundamental in clinical practice. Previous evidences demonstrated a large heterogeneity in these preferences. However, only few studies have analysed the influence of patients’ individual differences, contextual and situational qualities, and their complex interaction in explaining this variability. Methods: We assessed the role of the interaction of patient’s sociodemographic and psychological factors with a physician’s gender. Specifically, we focused on patient gender and attitudes toward male or female physicians. One hundred fifty-three people participated in this randomised controlled study a…

AdultMaleAdolescentConcordanceControl (management)shared decision making050109 social psychologypatient-centered care03 medical and health sciencesYoung AdultSex FactorsSettore M-PSI/01 - PSICOLOGIA GENERALEHumans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesIn patientSituational ethicscontrol preferencescontrol preferences gender differences patient-centered care sexism shared decision makingApplied PsychologyAgedPhysician-Patient Relations030505 public health05 social sciencesPatient PreferenceOriginal ArticlesMiddle AgedPatient preferenceClinical PracticeVignettePhysician genderResearch Designgender differencesgender differencecontrol preferenceFemaleOriginal ArticlesexismPatient Participation0305 other medical sciencePsychologyClinical psychology
researchProduct

Patient Preferences for Lung Cancer Treatment: A Qualitative Study Protocol Among Advanced Lung Cancer Patients

2021

Introduction: Lung cancer is the deadliest and most prevalent cancer worldwide. Lung cancer treatments have different characteristics and are associated with a range of benefits and side effects for patients. Such differences may raise uncertainty among drug developers, regulators, payers, and clinicians regarding the value of these treatment effects to patients. The value of conducting patient preference studies (using qualitative and/or quantitative methods) for benefits and side effects of different treatment options has been recognized by healthcare stakeholders, such as drug developers, regulators, health technology assessment bodies, and clinicians. However, evidence-based guidelines …

medicine.medical_specialtyLung NeoplasmsDecision Making03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingCarcinoma Non-Small-Cell LungNominal group techniqueMethodsmedicineHumans030212 general & internal medicineLung cancerQualitative ResearchReimbursementpatient involvementbusiness.industrylcsh:Public aspects of medicinePublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthHealth technologyCancerPatient Preferencelcsh:RA1-1270medicine.diseaseFocus groupdrug developmentlung cancerDrug developmentnominal group technique030220 oncology & carcinogenesisFamily medicinefocus group discussiondrug decision-makingPublic Healthbusinesspatient preferencesQualitative researchpatient-centered research
researchProduct

Patients’ health locus of control and preferences about the role that they want to play in the medical decision-making process

2021

Health locus of control (HLOC) may influence people’s behavior regarding their health as well as their desires to be involved in the medical decision-making. Our study aimed to examine HLOC’s relations with people’s control preferences about the medical decision-making. A total of 153 people filled out the self-administered version of the Control Preference Scale and the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale–form C. The most preferred role is the collaborative one. However, HLOC explained heterogeneity in people’s control preferences: lower scores in external HLOC were related to a greater preference for the active and the collaborative role. From the personalized medicine perspect…

AdultMalePatientsProcess (engineering)medical decision-makingApplied psychologySettore M-PSI/08 - PSICOLOGIA CLINICAYoung Adult03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineHumans030212 general & internal medicinecontrol preferencesInternal-External ControlApplied PsychologyControl preferenceshared decision-makingPatient PreferenceMedical decision makingHealth locus of control030227 psychiatryPsychiatry and Mental healthClinical PsychologyLocus of controlFemalePatient ParticipationPsychology
researchProduct

Patient Preferences for Lung Cancer Treatments: A Study Protocol for a Preference Survey Using Discrete Choice Experiment and Swing Weighting

2021

Background: Advanced treatment options for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consist of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of both. Decisions surrounding NSCLC can be considered as preference-sensitive because multiple treatments exist that vary in terms of mode of administration, treatment schedules, and benefit–risk profiles. As part of the IMI PREFER project, we developed a protocol for an online preference survey for NSCLC patients exploring differences in preferences according to patient characteristics (preference heterogeneity). Moreover, this study will evaluate and compare the use of two different preference elicitation methods, the discrete choice experiment (DCE) and …

medicine.medical_specialtyMedicine (General)Health literacyTask (project management)03 medical and health scienceseducational tool0302 clinical medicineQuality of life (healthcare)R5-920SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingMethodsmedicineMedical physicsPreference elicitationReimbursementnon-small cell lung cancerhealth locus of controlProtocol (science)030503 health policy & servicesdiscrete choice experimentGeneral MedicinePreferenceLocus of controlquality of life030220 oncology & carcinogenesisMedicineswing weighting0305 other medical sciencePsychologyhealth literacypatient preferenceFrontiers in medicine
researchProduct