0000000000465047
AUTHOR
Lisa Caulley
showing 14 related works from this author
MOESM2 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 2. Data extraction and normalisation processes.
MOESM3 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 3. Reporting checklist.
MOESM6 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 6. Exploratory analysis of topical data.
MOESM5 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 5. List of excluded articles.
MOESM2 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 2. Data extraction and normalisation processes.
MOESM1 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 1. Full strategy in PubMed/MEDLINE.
MOESM1 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 1. Full strategy in PubMed/MEDLINE.
MOESM4 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 4. List of PMID for included articles.
Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
[Background]: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide the most reliable information to inform clinical practice and patient care. We aimed to map global clinical research publication activity through RCT-related articles in high-impact-factor medical journals over the past five decades.
Reproducible research practices, openness and transparency in health economic evaluations: study protocol for a cross-sectional comparative analysis
2020
INTRODUCTION: There has been a growing awareness of the need for rigorously and transparent reported health research, to ensure the reproducibility of studies by future researchers. Health economic evaluations, the comparative analysis of alternative interventions in terms of their costs and consequences, have been promoted as an important tool to inform decision-making. The objective of this study will be to investigate the extent to which articles of economic evaluations of healthcare interventions indexed in MEDLINE incorporate research practices that promote transparency, openness and reproducibility. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is the study protocol for a cross-sectional comparative ana…
MOESM6 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 6. Exploratory analysis of topical data.
MOESM4 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 4. List of PMID for included articles.
MOESM3 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 3. Reporting checklist.
MOESM5 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 5. List of excluded articles.