0000000000465047

AUTHOR

Lisa Caulley

MOESM2 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 2. Data extraction and normalisation processes.

research product

MOESM3 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 3. Reporting checklist.

research product

MOESM6 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 6. Exploratory analysis of topical data.

research product

Reproducible research practices, openness and transparency in health economic evaluations: study protocol for a cross-sectional comparative analysis

INTRODUCTION: There has been a growing awareness of the need for rigorously and transparent reported health research, to ensure the reproducibility of studies by future researchers. Health economic evaluations, the comparative analysis of alternative interventions in terms of their costs and consequences, have been promoted as an important tool to inform decision-making. The objective of this study will be to investigate the extent to which articles of economic evaluations of healthcare interventions indexed in MEDLINE incorporate research practices that promote transparency, openness and reproducibility. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is the study protocol for a cross-sectional comparative ana…

research product

MOESM5 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 5. List of excluded articles.

research product

MOESM2 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 2. Data extraction and normalisation processes.

research product

MOESM1 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 1. Full strategy in PubMed/MEDLINE.

research product

MOESM1 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 1. Full strategy in PubMed/MEDLINE.

research product

MOESM4 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 4. List of PMID for included articles.

research product

MOESM6 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 6. Exploratory analysis of topical data.

research product

Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

[Background]: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide the most reliable information to inform clinical practice and patient care. We aimed to map global clinical research publication activity through RCT-related articles in high-impact-factor medical journals over the past five decades.

research product

MOESM4 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 4. List of PMID for included articles.

research product

MOESM3 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 3. Reporting checklist.

research product

MOESM5 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 5. List of excluded articles.

research product