0000000000466972

AUTHOR

Malek Jebabli

showing 4 related works from this author

Overlapping Community Structure in Co-authorship Networks: A Case Study

2014

Community structure is one of the key properties of real-world complex networks. It plays a crucial role in their behaviors and topology. While an important work has been done on the issue of community detection, very little attention has been devoted to the analysis of the community structure. In this paper, we present an extensive investigation of the overlapping community network deduced from a large-scale co-authorship network. The nodes of the overlapping community network represent the functional communities of the co-authorship network, and the links account for the fact that communities share some nodes in the co-authorship network. The comparative evaluation of the topological prop…

Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)FOS: Computer and information sciencesPhysics - Physics and Society0303 health sciences[ INFO ] Computer Science [cs]Theoretical computer scienceDynamic network analysisComputer scienceCommunity networkInterdependent networksDistributed computingCommunity structureFOS: Physical sciencesComputer Science - Social and Information NetworksNetwork sciencePhysics and Society (physics.soc-ph)02 engineering and technologyComplex network03 medical and health sciencesEvolving networks020204 information systems0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering[INFO]Computer Science [cs]Hierarchical network model030304 developmental biology2014 7th International Conference on u- and e- Service, Science and Technology
researchProduct

User and group networks on YouTube: A comparative analysis

2015

International audience; YouTube is the largest video-sharing social network where users (aka channels) can create links to any other users. Moreover, initially, users were allowed to create and join special groups of interest. Therefore, two types of online social networks can be defined. First, a user network where the nodes represent the users and the edges represent the social ties (friendship) between users. Second, a group network where the nodes represent the groups and the edges represent the social ties between groups, due to shared users. As the group network can be apprehended as the ground-truth overlapping community graph (where the nodes are the discovered communities and the l…

[ INFO ] Computer Science [cs]Social networkbusiness.industryComputer scienceCommunity structureComplex networkElectronic mailWorld Wide WebInterpersonal tiesEvolving networksGraph (abstract data type)Weighted network[INFO]Computer Science [cs]business
researchProduct

Community detection algorithm evaluation with ground-truth data

2018

International audience; Community structure is of paramount importance for the understanding of complex networks. Consequently, there is a tremendous effort in order to develop efficient community detection algorithms. Unfortunately, the issue of a fair assessment of these algorithms is a thriving open question. If the ground-truth community structure is available, various clustering-based metrics are used in order to compare it versus the one discovered by these algorithms. However, these metrics defined at the node level are fairly insensitive to the variation of the overall community structure. To overcome these limitations, we propose to exploit the topological features of the ‘communit…

Statistics and ProbabilityComputer science‘Community-graph’Community structureVariation (game tree)[INFO.INFO-RO]Computer Science [cs]/Operations Research [cs.RO]Complex networkCondensed Matter Physics01 natural sciencesGraph010305 fluids & plasmasCommunity structureSet (abstract data type)0103 physical sciencesNetwork analysis010306 general physicsCluster analysisAlgorithmNetwork analysis
researchProduct

Overlapping community detection versus ground-truth in AMAZON co-purchasing network

2015

International audience; Objective evaluation of community detection algorithms is a strategic issue. Indeed, we need to verify that the communities identified are actually the good ones. Moreover, it is necessary to compare results between two distinct algorithms to determine which is most effective. Classically, validations rely on clustering comparison measures or on quality metrics. Although, various traditional performance measures are used extensively. It appears very clearly that they cannot distinguish community structures with different topological properties. It is therefore necessary to propose an alternative methodology more sensitive to the community structure variations in orde…

[ INFO ] Computer Science [cs]Computer sciencemedia_common.quotation_subject02 engineering and technologycomputer.software_genreMachine learning01 natural sciencesClique percolation method010104 statistics & probability[SPI]Engineering Sciences [physics][ SPI ] Engineering Sciences [physics]0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineeringQuality (business)[INFO]Computer Science [cs]0101 mathematicsCluster analysisnetwork analysismedia_commonGround truthoverlapping community networksbusiness.industryCommunity structurePurchasing[ SPI.TRON ] Engineering Sciences [physics]/ElectronicsCommunity structure[SPI.TRON]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Electronicsdetection algorithmsoverlap- ping community networks020201 artificial intelligence & image processingAlgorithm designArtificial intelligenceData miningbusinesscomputerNetwork analysis
researchProduct