Treatment of inoperable and/or metastatic biliary tree carcinomas with single-agent gemcitabine or in combination with levofolinic acid and infusiona…

2001

Cisplatin and epirubicin plus oral lonidamine as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer: A phase II study of the Southern Italy Oncology G…

1998

Lonidamine (LND) is a unique antineoplastic drug derived from indazole-3-carboxylic acid which inhibits oxygen consumption and aerobic glycolysis, interfering with energy metabolism of neoplastic cells. LND has been experimentally shown to potentiate the cytotoxic effects of epirubicin (EPI) in human breast cancer cell lines, cisplatin activity in both platinum-sensitive and -resistant human ovarian carcinoma cell lines, and EPI antineoplastic activity in some recent phase III trials carried out in advanced breast cancer. A multicenter phase II trial was carried out with the combination of cisplatin 60 mg/m2, EPI 100 mg/m2 and LND 450 mg/day p.o. in three refracted doses/day starting 2 days…

Vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus cisplatin plus vindesine and mitomycin C in stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung carcinoma: a prospective randomized s…

2002

Abstract Purpose: To compare a regimen of vinorelbine and cisplatin (VC) to the combination of mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin (MVP) in patients with stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The main endpoits were analysis of objective response rates, toxicity, time to progression, and overall survival. Patients and methods: 247 eligible patients were randomized to receive (a) vinorelbine 25 mg/m 2 intravenous bolus on days 1and 8 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 on day 1 every 4 weeks, or (b) mitomycin c 8 mg/m 2 i.v. on day 1, vindesine 3 mg/m 2 i.v. on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, plus cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 on day 1 every 4 weeks. In subsequent cycles vindesine was given every oth…

Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine and cisplatin versus ifosfamide+gemcitabine followed by vinorelbine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine and…

2003

Abstract Purpose: we carried out a phase III randomized trial to compare vinorelbine–cisplatin regimen to gemcitabine–cisplatin regimen, and to a sequential administration of gemcitabine–ifosfamide followed by vinorelbine–cisplatin or the opposite sequence of vinorelbine–cisplatin followed by ifosfamide–gemcitabine according to the ‘worst drug rule’ hypothesis in patients with locally advanced unresectable stage IIIB or metastatic stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. The primary endpoint was survival parameters, while secondary endpoints included analysis of response rates and toxicity. Patients and methods: patients were randomized to receive: (a) gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15…