0000000000520002

AUTHOR

Eduardo Paixão

0000-0003-0850-1806

showing 2 related works from this author

Evaluating the microscopic effect of brushing stone tools as a cleaning procedure

2020

Cleaning stone tool surfaces is a common procedure in lithic studies. The first step widely applied at any archeological site (and/or at field laboratories) is the gross removal of sediment from the surfaces of artifacts. Lithic surface alterations due to mechanical action applied in wet or dry cleaning regimes have never been examined at a microscopic scale. This could have important implications in traceology, as any modern surface modifications inflicted on archeological artifacts might compromise their functional interpretations. The current trend toward quantification of use-wear traces makes the testing even more important, as even slight, apparently invisible surface alterations migh…

Stone toolbepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|AnthropologyBrushing010506 paleontologyCleaning protocolsSocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|AnthropologyDry cleaningengineering.material010502 geochemistry & geophysicsUse-wear analysis01 natural sciencesMicroscopic scaleSocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Anthropology|Archaeological AnthropologyStone toolsConfocal microscopyMining engineeringengineeringSurface roughnessbepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Anthropology|Archaeological Anthropologybepress|Social and Behavioral SciencesSocArXiv|Social and Behavioral SciencesControlled experimentGeology0105 earth and related environmental sciencesEarth-Surface Processes
researchProduct

Using mechanical experiments to study ground stone tool use: Exploring the formation of percussive and grinding wear traces on limestone tools

2021

Ground Stone Tools (GST) have been identified in several Levantine archaeological sites dating to the Middle Paleolithic. These tools, frequently made of limestone, are often interpreted based on their morphology and damage as having been used for knapping flint, and sometimes for breaking animal bones or processing vegetal materials as well. However, the lack of experimental referential collections on limestone is a major obstacle for the identification of diagnostic traces on these types of tools and raw material. In this sense, the understanding of the specific function of these GST and the association between tool types and activity often remains unknown or merely speculative. Recent di…

ArcheologyUse-wearKnappingSpecific functionGround stoneNatural (archaeology)GrindingPaleolithicMining engineeringGround stone toolsMiddle Paleolithic3D scanningMacroExperimentsAnimal boneQuantitative artifact microwear analysisLevantGeologyJournal of Archaeological Science: Reports
researchProduct