0000000000522628

AUTHOR

Jesper Bruun

showing 2 related works from this author

The Structured Assessment Dialogue

2017

The two key purposes of assessment, formative and summative, are often in a contradictory position if they are used concurrently. The summative assessment of learning will often prevent the formative assessment for learning to be realised (Butler, J Educ Psychol 79(4):474, 1987), meaning that the learning potential of the assessment will often be minimal. It is therefore a central challenge to find ways to combine the dual use of assessment. The structured assessment dialogue (SAD) is a candidate for such a combination.

050101 languages & linguisticsPeer feedback05 social sciences050301 education06 humanities and the artsDUAL (cognitive architecture)Formative assessmentLearning potentialSummative assessmentMathematics education0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesPsychology0503 educationMeaning (linguistics)
researchProduct

Unfolding principles for student peer feedback : a comparative analysis of examples across higher education contexts

2022

In this paper we conceptualize formative peer feedback principles by analyzing and comparing six empirical examples of formative peer feedback in a set of international STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) contexts. By discussing how these different approaches to peer feedback unfold in practice, we aim to facilitate the bridging of the gap between theory and practice in implementing peer feedback in Higher Education. As a group of researchers and teaching practitioners from six Higher Education institutions, we discussed, analyzed, and synthesized practical examples of peer feedback in STEM that cover a breadth of settings, aims, and forms. The analysis and comparison o…

vertaisarviointi (arviointimenetelmät)peer feedback in practicepalauteGeneral MedicineSTEMassessment criteriaformative feedbackkorkeakouluopetus
researchProduct