0000000000548506

AUTHOR

Carlos Ponce

showing 2 related works from this author

Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences

2020

Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findings. Researchers employ many different study designs that vary in their risk of bias to evaluate the true effect of interventions or impacts. Here, we empirically quantify, on a large scale, the prevalence of different study designs and the magnitude of bias in their estimates. Randomised designs and controlled observational designs with pre-intervention sampling were used by just 23% of intervention studies in biodiversity conservation, and 36% of intervention studies in social science. We demonstrate, through pairwise within-study comparisons across 49 environmental da…

0106 biological sciencesResearch designScientific communitySCIENTIFIC COMMUNITYMedio ambiente naturalsosiaalitieteetPsychological interventionGeneral Physics and AstronomySocial SciencesQH7501 natural sciencesEnvironmental impact//purl.org/becyt/ford/1 [https]010104 statistics & probability/706/648CredibilityPrevalenceSocial scienceComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSGEMultidisciplinaryEcologyQarticleSampling (statistics)Biodiversitynäyttöön perustuvat käytännötsatunnaistetut vertailukokeetENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTResearch designResearch DesignScale (social sciences)[SDE]Environmental SciencesH1ScienceEnvironment010603 evolutionary biologyGeneral Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular BiologySocial sciencesBiastutkimusmenetelmätQH541/704/172/4081Humans0101 mathematics//purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 [https]ympäristötieteetpoliittinen päätöksentekoClinical study designmetodologia/706/689General Chemistry15. Life on landEcologíaLiteraturePairwise comparisonObservational study/631/158luotettavuusBias; Biodiversity; Ecology; Environment; Humans; Literature; Prevalence; Research Design; Social SciencesNature Communications
researchProduct

Repeatability of Feather Mite Prevalence and Intensity in Passerine Birds

2014

Understanding why host species differ so much in symbiont loads and how this depends on ecological host and symbiont traits is a major issue in the ecology of symbiosis. A first step in this inquiry is to know whether observed differences among host species are species-specific traits or more related with host-symbiont environmental conditions. Here we analysed the repeatability (R) of the intensity and the prevalence of feather mites to partition within- and among-host species variance components. We compiled the largest dataset so far available: 119 Paleartic passerine bird species, 75,944 individual birds, ca. 1.8 million mites, seven countries, 23 study years. Several analyses and appro…

Mite Infestationslcsh:MedicineBiológiai tudományokHost-Parasite InteractionsSpecies SpecificityTermészettudományokSymbiosisbiology.animalAnimalsParasitologíaPasseriformesSymbiosislcsh:ScienceEcosystemMitesMultidisciplinaryEcologybiologyBird DiseasesHost (biology)EcologyFeather mitelcsh:RBiology and Life SciencesRepeatabilityFeathersbiology.organism_classificationPasserineSpecies InteractionsCommunity EcologyHabitatEvolutionary EcologyFeathervisual_artvisual_art.visual_art_mediumVariance componentsParasitologylcsh:QEctoparasitesAvesResearch ArticlePLoS ONE
researchProduct