0000000000555655
AUTHOR
Susana Portela
Prospective, randomized study of the endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) test in the infertility work-up to guide personalized embryo transfer versus fresh transfer or deferred embryo transfer
Oocyte donation outcome after oncological treatment in cancer survivors.
Objective To study reproductive outcome in patients cured of cancer who required oocyte donation (OD) owing to iatrogenic ovarian dysfunction. Design Multicenter, unmatched, retrospective cohorts study. Setting Private, university-affiliated group of clinics. Patient(s) Women treated and cured of cancer (n = 142) who underwent 333 cycles of OD (exposed group) and women without a previous cancer diagnosis (n = 17,844) who underwent 29,778 cycles of OD (unexposed cohort) between January 2000 and January 2012. Intervention(s) Retrospective chart review. Main Outcome Measure(s) Pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, and ongoing pregnancy rates. Result(s) There were no differences in terms of pre…
A 5-year multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing personalized, frozen and fresh blastocyst transfer in IVF.
Abstract Research question Does clinical performance of personalized embryo transfer (PET) guided by endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) differ from frozen embryo transfer (FET) or fresh embryo transfer in infertile patients undergoing IVF? Design Multicentre, open-label randomized controlled trial; 458 patients aged 37 years or younger undergoing IVF with blastocyst transfer at first appointment were randomized to PET guided by ERA, FET or fresh embryo transfer in 16 reproductive clinics. Results Clinical outcomes by intention-to-treat analysis were comparable, but cumulative pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the PET (93.6%) compared with FET (79.7%) (P = 0.0005) and fresh embr…