0000000000620223
AUTHOR
E. Durini
Dose intensification of mitoxantrone in combination with levofolinic acid, fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony stimulating factor support in advanced untreated breast cancer patients. A multicentric phase II study of the Southern Italy Oncology Group
Fifty-five consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (n = 57) were treated with a combination of levofolinic acid (I-FA) 100 mg/m2 plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 340 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1-3, cyclophosphamide (CTX) 600 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and mitoxantrone (DHAD) 12 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1. DHAD dose was progressively escalated by 2 mg/m2/cycle up to 18 mg/m2 in the absence of dose-limiting toxicities. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was given s.c. in order to prevent neutropenia. DHAD dosage could be increased to 18 mg/m2 in 66 out of 317 cycles of chemotherapy (21%). In most patients the dose-limiting toxicity was represented by myelosuppression. A statistically significa…
Epidoxorubicin and double biochemical 5-fluorouracil modulation with folinic acid and human lymphoblastoid interferon in advanced gastric carcinoma: a multicentric phase II study of the Southern Italy Oncology Group (GOIM).
In our previous randomized trial of advanced gastric cancer patients, the addition of epirubicin (EPI) to 5-fluorouracil (FU) with folinic acid (FA) resulted in an improved response rate and survival in the responder patients. Preclinical studies also showed an enhancement of FU and anthracyclines with interferon. To evaluate the possibility of human lymphoblastoid interferon (IFN) to enhance the therapeutic activity of the FA-FU + EPI combination regimen, 39 advanced gastric cancer patients received: FU at 375 mg/m2 i.v. immediately after FA (l-isomer form) at 100 mg/m2 i.v. for 5 consecutive days; EPI at 60 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, and IFN 3 MU s.c. for 7 consecutive days, starting 2 days bef…
Vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus cisplatin plus vindesine and mitomycin C in stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung carcinoma: a prospective randomized study.
Abstract Purpose: To compare a regimen of vinorelbine and cisplatin (VC) to the combination of mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin (MVP) in patients with stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The main endpoits were analysis of objective response rates, toxicity, time to progression, and overall survival. Patients and methods: 247 eligible patients were randomized to receive (a) vinorelbine 25 mg/m 2 intravenous bolus on days 1and 8 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 on day 1 every 4 weeks, or (b) mitomycin c 8 mg/m 2 i.v. on day 1, vindesine 3 mg/m 2 i.v. on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, plus cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 on day 1 every 4 weeks. In subsequent cycles vindesine was given every oth…
Gemcitabine and docetaxel every 2 weeks in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale
Abstract Introduction: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the gold standard in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although with relevant toxic effects. Both docetaxel (DCT) and gemcitabine (GEM) have shown activity as single agent in advanced NSCLC with a different toxicity profile and a lack of cross-resistance. Materials and methods: From April 2000 to May 2001, 47 consecutive patients were enrolled in a multicenter phase II trial. Main inclusion criteria included untreated patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC, age⩽70 years, stage IIIB/IV, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0–2, measurable disease, adequate hematologic, cardiac, hepatic and renal func…
Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine and cisplatin versus ifosfamide+gemcitabine followed by vinorelbine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine and cisplatin followed by ifosfamide and gemcitabine in stage IIIB-IV non small cell lung carcinoma: a prospective randomized phase III trial of the Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale.
Abstract Purpose: we carried out a phase III randomized trial to compare vinorelbine–cisplatin regimen to gemcitabine–cisplatin regimen, and to a sequential administration of gemcitabine–ifosfamide followed by vinorelbine–cisplatin or the opposite sequence of vinorelbine–cisplatin followed by ifosfamide–gemcitabine according to the ‘worst drug rule’ hypothesis in patients with locally advanced unresectable stage IIIB or metastatic stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. The primary endpoint was survival parameters, while secondary endpoints included analysis of response rates and toxicity. Patients and methods: patients were randomized to receive: (a) gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15…
Cisplatin plus weekly vinorelbine versus cisplatin plus vinorelbine on days 1 and 8 in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective randomized phase III trial of the G.O.I.M. (Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale).
Summary Purpose A phase III randomized trial was carried out to compare two schedules of the vinorelbine (VNR)–cisplatin (CDDP) regimen in patients with locally advanced unresectable poor prognosis stage IIIB or metastatic stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and analysis of toxicity, while secondary endpoints included response rates, time-to-progression (TTP) and quality of life (QoL). Patients and methods Eligible patients were randomized to receive: (a) VNR 25 mg/m 2 on day 1, 8 and 15 plus CDDP 100 mg/m 2 on day 1 every 4 weeks or (b) VNR 30 mg/m 2 on day 1 and 8 plus CDDP 80 mg/m 2 on day 1 every 3 weeks. All patients were chemotherapy-n…