0000000000641546

AUTHOR

Ernesto Garzón Valdés

showing 10 related works from this author

Guerra y derechos humanos

2003

Ciencias sociales. GeneralidadesUNESCO::CIENCIAS DE LAS ARTES Y LAS LETRAS:CIENCIAS DE LAS ARTES Y LAS LETRAS [UNESCO]Humanidades. GeneralidadesHumanidadesCiencias sociales
researchProduct

30 minutes of philosophy of law: Old and new problems

2007

Este trabajo recoge la intervención que cerró el seminario «Derecho, ética y política. Un debate en torno a la obra de Ernesto Garzón Valdés» (Alicante, 15 y 16 de junio de 2007). En ella se recogen algunas reflexiones del autor sobre los problemas cruciales de los que debería ocuparse la filosofía del Derecho contemporánea: 1) Estado de Derecho y terrorismo; 2) el impacto de las investigaciones neurológicas en el concepto de responsabilidad; 3) la erosión de las estructuras institucionales a nivel internacional; 4) la relación entre etica, política y Derecho desde el punto de vista de una filosofía analítica del Derecho; y 5) América Latina como contexto de investigación jurídico-filosófic…

DerechoLatin Americansmedia_common.quotation_subjectK201-487Context (language use)K1-7720PhilosophyPoliticsLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. JurisprudenceState (polity)Political scienceTerrorismInstitutional structureJurisprudence. Philosophy and theory of lawPhilosophy of lawLawHumanitiesLegal philosophymedia_commonFilosofía del DerechoDoxa
researchProduct

On Justifying Legal Paternalism

1990

. Paternalism, understood as coercive intervention with the behavior of a person in order to prevent her from causing harm to herself, is a highly controversial issue, because it implies a departure from the widely recognized principle of harm to others. Some conceptual differences between legal paternalism and other forms of state coercion that also depart from the principle of harm to others will be indicated. This is followed by an analysis of the arguments that are usually brought forth against legal paternalism. And finally, the possibility of determining ethically justifiable types of legal paternalism is explored.

HarmState (polity)Intervention (counseling)Political sciencemedia_common.quotation_subjectLawCoercionLawhealth care economics and organizationshumanitiesPaternalismmedia_commonRatio Juris
researchProduct

What Could Mean “To Think in Spanish”?

2008

The expression “to think in Spanish” could be understand in two different senses: as an exhortation or as a description of an state of affairs. In the first sense it has a normative character. It can means something like “we must think in Spanish!”. In the second case, it would be a more or less vague formulation about the existence of a relevant intelectual tradition in the spanish language. The first interpretation is misleading and can have excluding or trivial consequences. The second one is partially true. I propose a third interpretation: “to think in Spanish” could be understood as an invitation not to forget our Spanish-speaking environment in the double sense of the physical and in…

Cultural StudiesLiteratureSpanish languageSociology and Political Sciencebusiness.industryGeneral Arts and Humanitiesmedia_common.quotation_subjectPhilosophyInterpretation (philosophy)Character (symbol)State of affairsEpistemologyExpression (architecture)OriginalityPatriotismNormativebusinessmedia_commonArbor
researchProduct

Menschenwürde, Menschenrechte und Demokratie

2018

In welcher Beziehung stehen Menschenwurde, Menschenrechte und Demokratie? Dieser Frage ist der vorliegende Beitrag gewidmet. Zur Beantwortung der Frage werde ich folgendermasen vorgehen. Zunachst stelle ich meine Grundannahme zur Menschenwurde vor (1).

researchProduct

Some Remarks on the Concept of Toleration

1997

The paper contains a conceptual analysis of “act of toleration” and the property of “being tolerant”. Being tolerant is understood as a dispositional property of persons manifested in what the author calls the “circumstances of toleration”. The main circumstances distinguished are: a tendency to prohibit a certain behaviour and the competence to determine the deontic status of the behaviour in question. An act of toleration, then, consists in not prohibiting (or cancelling the prohibition of) that behaviour. It is argued that this requires the existence of two different normative systems, the “basic system”, and the “justifying system”. Acts of toleration must be based on reasons coming fro…

Competence (law)Property (philosophy)Normative systemsAcquiescencemedia_common.quotation_subjectDeontic logicPhilosophyTolerationLawmedia_commonEpistemologyRatio Juris
researchProduct

Entrevista a Ernesto Garzón Valdés

2003

Ciencias sociales. GeneralidadesUNESCO::CIENCIAS DE LAS ARTES Y LAS LETRAS:CIENCIAS DE LAS ARTES Y LAS LETRAS [UNESCO]Humanidades. GeneralidadesHumanidadesCiencias sociales
researchProduct

Dignidad y derechos humanos. 1/3

2008

ConferenciaDuración: 30M

5602 Ciències Jurídiques. Legislació
researchProduct

Dignidad y derechos humanos. 2/4

2008

ConferenciaDuración: 30M

5602 Ciències Jurídiques. Legislació
researchProduct

Dignidad y derechos humanos. 3/3

2008

ConferenciaDuración: 30M

5602 Ciències Jurídiques. Legislació
researchProduct