0000000000684787

AUTHOR

Renzo Rosso

showing 4 related works from this author

Scaling properties of topologically random channel networks

1996

Abstract The analysis deals with the scaling properties of infinite topologically random channel networks (ITRNs) fast introduced by Shreve (1967, J. Geol. , 75: 179–186) to model the branching structure of rivers as a random process. The expected configuration of ITRNs displays scaling behaviour only asymptotically, when the ruler (or ‘yardstick’) length is reduced to a very small extent. The random model can also reproduce scaling behaviour at larger ruler lengths if network magnitude and diameter are functionally related according to a reported deterministic rule. This indicates that subsets of rrRNs can be scaling and, although rrRNs are asymptotically plane-filling due to the law of la…

Discrete mathematicsDimension (vector space)YardstickLaw of large numbersStochastic processStructure (category theory)Magnitude (mathematics)Statistical physicsScalingWater Science and TechnologyMathematicsCommunication channelJournal of Hydrology
researchProduct

Twenty-three unsolved problems in hydrology (UPH) – a community perspective

2019

Publisher's version (útgefin grein)

hydrology science questions research agenda interdisciplinary knowledge gaps0208 environmental biotechnologyUT-Hybrid-DWASShydrology02 engineering and technologyOceanografi hydrologi och vattenresurserHydrology and Quantitative Water ManagementOceanography Hydrology and Water ResourcesQEÞekking910 Geography & travelVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Geofag: 450::Hydrologi: 454ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSmedia_commonWater Science and Technologyknowledge gap[SHS.SOCIO]Humanities and Social Sciences/SociologyVDP::Landbruks- og Fiskerifag: 900Hydroglogy6. Clean waterJustice and Strong InstitutionsTASpitescience questionsDisciplineHydrologie en Kwantitatief Waterbeheerhydrology;science questions;research agenda;knowledge gaps;interdisciplinarySDG 16 - PeaceProcess (engineering)media_common.quotation_subjectHidrologiaVatnafræðiresearch agendaContext (language use)Digital mediaknowledge gapsITC-HYBRID[SDU.STU.HY]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Hydrologyhydrology; science questions; research agenda; interdisciplinary; knowledge gapsHydrologyWIMEKhydrology; interdisciplinary; knowledge gaps; research agenda; science questionsbusiness.industrySDG 16 - Peace Justice and Strong InstitutionsPublic consultationRannsóknir500 ScienceBodemfysica en Landbeheer/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/peace_justice_and_strong_institutions[SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environmental and SocietyWater Resources Management020801 environmental engineeringSoil Physics and Land ManagementSocio-hydrologyITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLEinterdisciplinaryAðferðafræðibusinessDiversity (politics)
researchProduct

Twenty-three unsolved problems in hydrology (UPH) – a community perspective

2019

This paper is the outcome of a community initiative to identify major unsolved scientific problems in hydrology motivated by a need for stronger harmonisation of research efforts. The procedure involved a public consultation through online media, followed by two workshops through which a large number of potential science questions were collated, prioritised, and synthesised. In spite of the diversity of the participants (230 scientists in total), the process revealed much about community priorities and the state of our science: a preference for continuity in research questions rather than radical departures or redirections from past and current work. Questions remain focused on the process-…

13. Climate action6. Clean water
researchProduct

Twenty-three unsolved problems in hydrology (UPH) – a community perspective

2019

This paper is the outcome of a community initiative to identify major unsolved scientific problems in hydrology motivated by a need for stronger harmonisation of research efforts. The procedure involved a public consultation through online media, followed by two workshops through which a large number of potential science questions were collated, prioritised, and synthesised. In spite of the diversity of the participants (230 scientists in total), the process revealed much about community priorities and the state of our science: a preference for continuity in research questions rather than radical departures or redirections from past and current work. Questions remain focused on the process-…

13. Climate action6. Clean water
researchProduct