0000000000745396

AUTHOR

Neal R. Haddaway

0000-0003-3902-2234

showing 1 related works from this author

How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals

2015

Delays in peer reviewed publication may have consequences for both assessment of scientific prowess in academics as well as communication of important information to the knowledge receptor community. We present an analysis on the perspectives of authors publishing in conservation biology journals regarding their opinions on the importance of speed in peer-review as well as how to improve review times. Authors were invited to take part in an online questionnaire, of which the data was subjected to both qualitative (open coding, categorizing) and quantitative analyses (generalized linear models). We received 637 responses to a total of 6,547 e-mail invitations sent. Peer-review speed was gene…

0106 biological sciencesPersistence (psychology)GerontologyMedical educationMultidisciplinarybusiness.industryPrestigelcsh:Reducationlcsh:MedicineComputer-assisted web interviewingBibliometrics010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesPeer reviewCompetition (economics)03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinePublishingMedicinelcsh:Q030212 general & internal medicineChemistry (relationship)lcsh:SciencebusinessPLOS ONE
researchProduct