0000000000751368

AUTHOR

Constantin Bicer

showing 1 related works from this author

Comparison of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) and without epinephrine in inferior alveolar block for tooth extraction: double-blind randomi…

2011

The purpose of this clinical prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) and without epinephrine in inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia for extractions of mandibular teeth.Eighty-eight patients received intraoral inferior alveolar nerve blocks using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (n = 41; group 1) or without epinephrine (n = 47; group 2) for extractions of mandibular teeth. The primary objectives were differences in onset as well as in length of soft tissue anesthesia. The amount of anesthetic solution, need of a second injection, pain while injecting, pain during treatment, postoperative pain,…

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyAdolescentEpinephrineAnesthesia DentalMandibular NerveOperative TimeMandibular nerveCarticaineAnesthetic AgentInferior alveolar nerveArticainePathology and Forensic Medicinelaw.inventionYoung AdultCarticaineDouble-Blind MethodRandomized controlled triallawHumansVasoconstrictor AgentsMedicineRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingDentistry (miscellaneous)Prospective StudiesAnesthetics LocalAgedAged 80 and overPain PostoperativeChi-Square Distributionbusiness.industryNerve BlockMiddle AgedSurgeryEpinephrineAnesthesiaTooth ExtractionAnestheticFemaleSurgeryOral Surgerybusinessmedicine.drugOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
researchProduct