0000000000766124

AUTHOR

Norharlina Bahar

showing 2 related works from this author

Expert appraisal of criteria for assessing gaming disorder: An international Delphi study

2021

Background and aims Following the recognition of ‘internet gaming disorder’ (IGD) as a condition requiring further study by the DSM‐5, ‘gaming disorder’ (GD) was officially included as a diagnostic entity by the World Health Organization (WHO) in the eleventh revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD‐11). However, the proposed diagnostic criteria for gaming disorder remain the subject of debate, and there has been no systematic attempt to integrate the views of different groups of experts. To achieve a more systematic agreement on this new disorder, this study employed the Delphi expert consensus method to obtain expert agreement on the diagnostic validity, clinical util…

Research Reportmedicine.medical_specialtyInternet addictionDelphi TechniquediagnosisGaming disordermedia_common.quotation_subjectDelphi methodinternet gaming disorderMedizin030508 substance abuseMedicine (miscellaneous)DelphiWorld health03 medical and health sciencesgaming disorderddc:616.89DSMInternet gaming disorder0302 clinical medicineDiagnosismedicineHumansMedical physics030212 general & internal medicinemedia_commoncomputer.programming_languageInternetResearch Reports (Alcohol‐Drugs‐Solvents‐Gambling‐Nicotine)ICDExpert consensusJoc compulsiuDeceptionBehavior AddictiveDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersDisruptive Impulse Control and Conduct DisordersPsychiatry and Mental healthMoodVideo GamesDiagnostic validityAddicció a Internet0305 other medical sciencePsychologyCompulsive gamblingcomputerDelphiGaming Disorder; Delphi; DSM; ICD; Diagnosis; Internet Gaming Disorder
researchProduct

Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective: Commentary on: A weak scientific basis for …

2018

The proposed introduction of gaming disorder (GD) in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) has led to a lively debate over the past year. Besides the broad support for the decision in the academic press, a recent publication by van Rooij et al. (2018) repeated the criticism raised against the inclusion of GD in ICD-11 by Aarseth et al. (2017). We argue that this group of researchers fails to recognize the clinical and public health considerations, which support the WHO perspective. It is important to recognize a range of biases that may influence this debate; in particular, the gaming industry may wish to …

medicine.medical_specialtyInclusion (disability rights)clinical perspective030508 substance abuseMedicine (miscellaneous)DiseaseWorld healthgaming disorder03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineICD-11medicineMedia psychologybusiness.industryPublic healthpublic healthPerspective (graphical)General MedicinePublic relations030227 psychiatry3. Good healthPsychiatry and Mental healthClinical PsychologyCriticismPosition (finance)0305 other medical sciencebusinessPsychologyJournal of behavioral addictions
researchProduct