0000000000853520

AUTHOR

Robert-jan Van Geuns

showing 3 related works from this author

Prognostic Value of Microvascular Obstruction and Infarct Size, as Measured by CMR in STEMI Patients

2014

The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of microvascular obstruction (MO) and infarct size as a percentage of left ventricular mass (15%LV), as measured by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance, in predicting major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) at 2 years in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction reperfused by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Individual data from 1,025 patients were entered into the pooled analysis. MO was associated with the occurrence of MACE, defined as a composite of cardiac death, congestive heart failure, and myocardial re-infarction (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.74; 95% confidence interval: 2.21 to 6.34). IS% LV >= 25% w…

Malemedicine.medical_specialtyTime Factorsmedicine.medical_treatmentmicrovascular obstructionHeart VentriclesMyocardial Infarction[SDV.IB.MN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering/Nuclear medicineRisk Assessmentcardiac magnetic resonance[ SDV.IB.MN ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering/Nuclear medicinePercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsRecurrenceRisk FactorsInternal medicineCoronary CirculationMedicineinfarct sizeHumansRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingMyocardial infarctioncardiovascular diseasesAdverse effectComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSAgedHeart Failurebusiness.industryMicrocirculationMyocardiumHazard ratioPercutaneous coronary interventionMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingConfidence intervalTreatment OutcomeRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingHeart failureNo reflow phenomenonCardiologyNo-Reflow PhenomenonFemaleprognosisCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicinebusinessMaceJACC. Cardiovascular imaging
researchProduct

Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffold Versus Xience Metallic Stent for Prevention of Restenosis Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients at H…

2019

Abstract Background The advent of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) was considered as a potential improvement in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after the groundbreaking development of drug eluting stents (DES). However, the clinical performance, long-term safety and efficacy of BVS in complex coronary lesions remain uncertain. COMPARE ABSORB, a multicenter, single blind, prospective randomized trial, aims to compare the clinical outcomes between the Absorb BVS and Xience everolimus-eluting metallic stent (EES) in patients with coronary artery disease and a high risk of restenosis. Design COMPARE ABSORB is designed to enroll 2100 patients at up to 45 European sites. Enrolled p…

MaleBioresorbable scaffoldTime Factorsmedicine.medical_treatmentVascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16]030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyAbsorbCoronary artery diseaseCoronary artery disease0302 clinical medicineRestenosisRisk FactorsAbsorbable ImplantsClinical endpointMulticenter Studies as TopicMedicineSingle-Blind MethodProspective Studies030212 general & internal medicineMyocardial infarctionAngioplasty Balloon CoronaryGeneral MedicineMiddle AgedEuropeTreatment OutcomeMetalsCardiologyFemaleStentsCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineAdultmedicine.medical_specialtyAdolescentProsthesis DesignRisk AssessmentCoronary RestenosisYoung Adult03 medical and health sciencesAll institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical CenterInternal medicineHumansAgedbusiness.industryStentPercutaneous coronary interventionCoronary Lesion ComplexityProtective Factorsmedicine.diseaseConventional PCIbusiness
researchProduct

Contemporary practice and technical aspects in coronary intervention with bioresorbable scaffolds : a European perspective

2015

Aims Next to patient characteristics, the lack of a standardised approach for bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation is perceived as a potential explanation for the heterogeneous results reported so far. To provide some guidance, we sought to find a consensus on the best practices for BVS implantation and management across a broad array of patient and lesion scenarios. Methods and results Fourteen European centres with a high volume of BVS procedures combined their efforts in an informal collaboration. To get the most objective snapshot of different practices among the participating centres, a survey with 45 multiple choice questions was prepared and conducted. The results of th…

Diagnostic Imagingmedicine.medical_specialtyConsensusBest practiceMEDLINEPatient characteristicsConsensus criteriaCoronary Artery DiseaseProsthesis DesignPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesAbsorbable ImplantsmedicineHumansMedical physicsPractice Patterns Physicians'Multiple choiceBioresorbable vascular scaffoldbusiness.industryPatient SelectionSurgeryEuropeTreatment OutcomeHealth Care SurveysCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicinebusinessBioresorbable scaffoldIntravascular imagingHospitals High-Volume
researchProduct