0000000000949949

AUTHOR

Mabel Tidball

0000-0002-5576-0977

showing 4 related works from this author

Taking firms’ margin targets seriously in a model of competition in supply functions

2022

We introduce price-markup objectives into a model of supply function competition. We characterize the corresponding supply-function equilibrium and study its qualitative properties. Adherence to price-markup targets is conducive to reduced market competition and increased firm profitability. While pursuing such goals reduces social welfare, welfare never drops below the level corresponding to a Cournot oligopoly. Finally, we establish conditions under which consumer preference for fair pricing inhibits the industry's use of markups as a collusive device.

TheoryofComputation_MISCELLANEOUSoligopolyTheoryofComputation_GENERALsupply functionprice fixing[SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciencesmarkup pricing
researchProduct

A new rationale for not picking low hanging fruits: the separation of property and control

2018

National audience; Technological innovations make possible a continuous improvement of the energy efficiency of industrial systems. The optimization of production processes in combination with the acquisition of innovative energy efficiency solutions enables better energy management and performance. These improvements are deemed to be profitable since they strengthen the competitiveness of the firm while enabling the achievement of social and environmental responsibility objectives such as reducing pollutant emissions. From this perspective, firms should seize every opportunity to improve their energy efficiency. In actual practice, however, even investments that involve low up-front expend…

[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance
researchProduct

Regulation of Investments in Infrastructure: The Interplay between Strategic Behaviors and Initial Endowments

2012

This paper explores the dynamic properties of price-based policies in a model of competition between two jurisdictions. Jurisdictions invest over time in infrastructure to increase the quality of the environment, a global public good. They are identical in all respects but one: initial stocks of infrastructure. This is a dynamic type of heterogeneity that disappears in the long run. Therefore, at the steady state, usual intuitions from static settings apply: identical jurisdictions inefficiently underinvest, calling for public subsidies. In the short run, however, counterintuitive properties are established: (i) the evolution of capital stocks can be nonmonotonic and (ii) one jurisdiction c…

Economics and EconometricsPublic infrastructureSociology and Political Science0211 other engineering and technologies02 engineering and technology[SHS]Humanities and Social SciencesCompetition (economics)Microeconomics0502 economics and business[ SHS ] Humanities and Social SciencesEconomics[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances050207 economicsInvestments[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSShort runEndowments05 social sciences021107 urban & regional planningSubsidyInvestment (macroeconomics)[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceGlobal public goodComplementarity (molecular biology)Capital (economics)[SHS] Humanities and Social SciencesFinance
researchProduct

A new rationale for not picking low hanging fruits: The separation of ownership and control

2019

Recent attempts at explaining the energy-efficiency gap rely on considerations related to organizational and behavioral/cognitive failures. In this paper, we build on the strategic delegation literature to advance a complementary explanation. It is shown that strategic market interaction may encourage business owners to instill a bias against energy efficiency in managerial compensation contracts. Since managers respond to financial incentives, their decisions will reflect this bias, resulting in lack of investment.

0106 biological sciences[QFIN]Quantitative Finance [q-fin]Compensation (psychology)Control (management)Separation (aeronautics)strategic delegation010501 environmental sciencesInvestment (macroeconomics)[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance01 natural sciences[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences010601 ecologyFinancial incentivesenergy paradoxStrategic delegationBusiness[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Financebehavioral biasIndustrial organizationenergy efficiency0105 earth and related environmental sciencesGeneral Environmental ScienceEfficient energy use
researchProduct