0000000000955797

AUTHOR

Harald Seifert

showing 2 related works from this author

Once-Daily Oral Levofloxacin Monotherapy versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam Three Times a Day: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial in Patients with…

2004

A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily oral monotherapy with 500 mg levofloxacin in comparison with 4.5 g piperacillin/tazobactam 3 times a day in patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia. Low risk was defined by oral temperatureor = 38.5 degrees C on one occasion oror = 38.0 degrees C twice within 24 hours and granulocytopeniaor = 500/microL for less than 10 days. The primary end point was defined as defervescence after 72 hours followed by at least 7 afebrile days. Secondary end points were overall response, time to defervescence, survival on day 30, and toxicity. Thirty-four episodes were included. Fever o…

AdultMaleOfloxacinTazobactammedicine.medical_specialtyNeutropeniaFeverAdministration OralPenicillanic AcidAntineoplastic AgentsLevofloxacinNeutropeniaFever of Unknown OriginTazobactamDrug Administration ScheduleImmunocompromised HostLevofloxacinNeoplasmsInternal medicineMulticenter trialHumansMedicineProspective StudiesAgedAntibacterial agentPiperacillinbusiness.industryBacterial InfectionsHematologyMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseSurgeryTreatment OutcomePiperacillin/tazobactamDrug Therapy CombinationFemaleDisease SusceptibilitySafetybusinessFebrile neutropeniaPiperacillinmedicine.drugInternational Journal of Hematology
researchProduct

A quality improvement study on the reduction of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections by use of self-disinfecting venous access c…

2020

Background Contamination of the catheter hub is an important source of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI); catheter hub caps incorporating a 70% isopropyl alcohol aim are designed to reduce contamination and hence CLABSI rates. Supporting data in high-risk hematological and oncological patients on the clinical effectiveness of this approach are sparse. Methods We conducted a before-after single center study accompanying the introduction of such caps at our department. Retrospective data from the year prior to the introduction were compared to 1 year of prospective data. Results The control and antiseptic barrier cap (ABC) groups consisted of 309 and 289 patients present…

Catheterization Central Venousmedicine.medical_specialtyEpidemiologymedicine.drug_classmedicine.medical_treatmentPopulationBacteremiaSingle Center03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineAntisepticSepsisInternal medicinemedicineCentral Venous CathetersHumansProspective Studies030212 general & internal medicineeducationRetrospective Studies0303 health scienceseducation.field_of_study030306 microbiologybusiness.industryHealth PolicySignificant differenceHazard ratioPublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthQuality ImprovementVenous accessCatheterInfectious DiseasesCatheter-Related InfectionsbusinessCentral venous catheterAmerican Journal of Infection Control
researchProduct