0000000000994075
AUTHOR
Detlef A. Link
The floral nectaries in theLimnanthaceae
Floral nectaries in theLimnanthaceae are established as exoscopic basal bulges of the episepalous stamens. Their nectariferous tissues include the epidermis and hypodermal parenchyma and inLimnanthes are vascularized by phloematic branches of the staminal bundles. Secretion occurs mainly through anomocytic stomata but, in addition, probably through the outer cuticularized thin walls of the epidermal cells. The flower structure is comparatively simple. The nectar is often slightly concealed. A wide range of pollinators can be expected, but bees are observed to be the dominant ones. The systematic position of the family is still obscure. Taxonomic placement near to any other geranialian famil…
The floral nectaries in theIrvingiaceae
TheIrvingiaceae generally possess large intrastaminal receptacular disc nectaries of the mesenchymatic histo-type, which receive numerous small phloematic bundles directly from the central stele. The non-glandular epidermis bears some 10 to 15 strictly localized stomata that are deeply sunken in the parenchyma. The nectar is assumed to be exposed on the disc surface. Flowers are of simple construction, lacking specialized organs to attract pollinators. A wide range of pollinators is thus expected. TheIrvingiaceae have more characters in common withSimaroubaceae thanIxonanthaceae and should therefore be retransferred as a family of their own next toSimaroubaceae.
The Floral Nectaries of the Geraniales and their Systematic Implications.
Summary In the monogeneric family Ctenolophonaceae extrastaminal discs are developed, whose parenchyma and marginally stomata bearing epidermis appear to be adenoid. The discs are extensively vascularized by phloematic branches derived from bundles of the adnate stamens. The flowers are unshowy, simply constructed and without special nectar protecting structures. Pollinators are still unknwon, but nectar-exploiting bees and flies probably predominate. The Ctenolophonaceae are closely connected with Humiriaceae. Presumed affinities with Malpighiaceae are questioned.