0000000001043742
AUTHOR
Heinrich Frank
Differential Enantioselectivity of Murine GlutathioneS-Transferase Isoenzymes in the Glutathione Conjugation ofTrans-3,4-dihydroxy-1,2-oxy- 1,2,3,4-tetrahydrobenzo[c]phenanthrene Stereoisomers
Abstract The kinetics of the glutathione (GSH) conjugation of (+)- and (−)-enantiomers ofanti- as well assyn-3,4-dihydroxy-1,2-oxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrobenzo[c]phenanthrene (B[c]PDE) catalyzed by murine GSHS-transferase (GST) isoenzymes has been investigated. Murine GSTs exhibited significant differences in their enantioselectivity toward B[c]PDE stereoisomers. For example, while pi class isoenzyme mGSTP1-1 was virtually inactive toward stereoisomers with 1Sconfiguration [(−)-syn-and (+)-anti-B[c]PDE], these stereoisomers were good substrates for alpha class isoenzyme mGSTA1-2. When GST activity was measured as a function of varying B[c]PDE concentration (10–320 μM) at a fixed saturating conce…
CARCINOGENESIS: Glutathione S-transferase A1–1-catalysed conjugation of bay and fjord region diol epoxides of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with glutathione
the fjord region diol epoxides a similar substrate enantioselectivity was noted, i.e. the enantiomer with the corresponding R configuration was again preferentially conjugated. In contrast, for the bay region syn -diol epoxides this substrate selectivity was reversed, resulting in a preference for the enantiomer with the S configuration. The chemically more reactive syn diastereomers were in general better substrates for GST Al-1 than the corresponding anti diastereomers. However, a comparison between different diol epoxide diastereomers revealed no obvious correlation between chemical reactivity of the compounds and catalytic efficiencies. Furthermore, no significant correlation between di…