6533b7cefe1ef96bd125702d

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The effect of longitudinal chromatic aberration on the lag of accommodation and depth of field.

Norberto López-gilIván Marín-franchIván Marín-franchMateusz Tomasz JaskulskiPaula Bernal-molinaPaula Bernal-molina

subject

AdultMaleAccommodative responseLag01 natural sciencesDeformable mirror010309 optics03 medical and health sciencesYoung Adult0302 clinical medicineOpticsPhysiological optics0103 physical sciencesChromatic aberrationHumansDepth of fieldMathematicsDepth Perceptionbusiness.industryAccommodation OcularEmmetropiaSensory SystemsOphthalmology030221 ophthalmology & optometryOptometryFemaleMonochromatic colorbusinessAccommodationColor PerceptionPhotic StimulationOptometry

description

Purpose Longitudinal chromatic aberration is present in all states of accommodation and may play a role in the accommodation response and the emmetropisation process. We study the change of the depth of field (DOFi) with the state of accommodation, taking into account the longitudinal chromatic aberration. Methods Subjective DOFi was defined as the range of defocus beyond which the blur of the target (one line of optotypes of 0.1 logMAR shown on a black-and-white microdisplay, seen through different colour filters) was perceived as objectionable. The subject's eye was paralysed and different, previously-measured accommodative states (corresponding to the accommodative demands of 0D, 2D and 4D) were simulated with a deformable mirror. Different colour conditions (monochromatic red, green and blue and polychromatic (white) were tested. The DOFi was measured subjectively, using a motorised Badal system. Results Taking as reference the average accommodative response for the white stimulus, the blue response exhibits on average a lead of 0.45 ± 0.09D, the green a negligible lead of 0.07 ± 0.02D and red a lag of 0.49 ± 0.10D. The monochromatic DOFi, calculated by averaging DOFi over the red, green and blue colour conditions for each accommodative demand was 1.10 ± 0.10D for 0D, 1.20 ± 0.08D for 2D, and 1.26 ± 0.40D for 4D. The polychromatic white DOFi were greater than the average monochromatic DOFi by 19%, 9% and 14% for 0D, 2D, and 4D of accommodative demand, respectively. Conclusion The longitudinal chromatic aberration causes a dioptric shift of the monochromatic accommodation response. The study did not reveal this shift to depend on the accommodative demand or to have an effect on the DOFi.

10.1111/opo.12320https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27790774