6533b7cefe1ef96bd12571c3

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Effects of a Rehabilitation Program on Perceived Environmental Barriers in Older Patients Recovering from Hip Fracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Marja ArkelaAri HeinonenMauri KallinenJohanna EdgrenErja PortegijsAnu SalpakoskiTaina RantanenSarianna SipiläMerja Rantakokko

subject

medicine.medical_specialtyMultivariate analysisTime FactorsympäristöArticle Subjectmedicine.medical_treatmentPsychological interventionlcsh:MedicineEnvironmentGeneral Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular Biologylaw.inventionfemoral fracturePhysical medicine and rehabilitationStairsOlder patientsRandomized controlled triallawmedicineta319HumansAgedAged 80 and overHip fractureRehabilitationGeneral Immunology and Microbiologybusiness.industryHip Fractureskotikuntoutuslcsh:RagingCase-control studyGeneral Medicinemedicine.diseaseikääntyminensaavutettavuusCase-Control StudiesMultivariate AnalysisPhysical therapyClinical Studykuntoutuslonkkamurtumaesteettömyys ja saavutettavuusbusiness

description

Objectives. To study effects of a one-year multicomponent intervention on perceived environmental barriers in hip fracture patients.Design. Randomized controlled trial of a 12-month home-based rehabilitation aiming to improve mobility and function (ISRCTN53680197); secondary analyses.Subjects. Community-dwelling hip fracture patients on average 70 days after trauma (n=81).Methods. Assessments at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months later included perceived entrance-related barriers (e.g., indoor/outdoor stairs, lighting, floor surfaces, and storage for mobility devices) and perceived barriers in the outdoor environment (poor street condition, hilly terrain, long-distances, and lack of resting places). Sum scores for entrance-related and outdoor barriers were analyzed using general estimating equation models.Results. At baseline, 48% and 37% of the patients perceived at least one entrance-related barrier, and 62% and 60% perceived at least one outdoor barrier in the intervention and control group, respectively. Over time, (P=0.003) the number of entrance-related barriers decreased in both groups (groupP=0.395; interactionP=0.571). For outdoor barriers, time (P=0.199), group (P=0.911), and interaction effect (P=0.430) were not significant.Conclusion. Our intervention had no additional benefit over standard care in hip fracture patients. Further study is warranted to determine whether perceived environmental barriers can be reduced by interventions targeted at the older individual. This trial is registered withISRCTN53680197.

10.1155/2013/769645http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3748419