6533b7cefe1ef96bd1257bd9

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Quantification and automatized adaptive detection of in vivo and in vitro neuronal bursts based on signal complexity.

Jarno E. MikkonenJari HyttinenFikret E. KapucuJarno M. A. Tanskanen

subject

Computer scienceQuantitative Biology::Tissues and OrgansAstrophysics::High Energy Astrophysical PhenomenaEntropyCell Culture TechniquesElectrophysiological PhenomenaAction Potentialsta3112HippocampusEntropy (classical thermodynamics)In vivoEntropy (information theory)AnimalsEntropy (energy dispersal)Rats WistarEntropy (arrow of time)ta217NeuronsSignal processingQuantitative Biology::Neurons and Cognitionta213Entropy (statistical thermodynamics)Signal Processing Computer-Assistedadaptive detectionelectrophysiological signal analysisquantificationneuronal burstsElectrophysiological PhenomenaSample entropyElectrophysiologyElectrophysiologyMicroelectrodeBiological systemNeuroscienceMicroelectrodesEntropy (order and disorder)

description

In this paper, we propose employing entropy values to quantify action potential bursts in electrophysiological measurements from the brain and neuronal cultures. Conventionally in the electrophysiological signal analysis, bursts are quantified by means of conventional measures such as their durations, and number of spikes in bursts. Here our main aim is to device metrics for burst quantification to provide for enhanced burst characterization. Entropy is a widely employed measure to quantify regularity/complexity of time series. Specifically, we investigate the applicability and differences of spectral entropy and sample entropy in the quantification of bursts in in vivo rat hippocampal measurements and in in vitro dissociated rat cortical cell culture measurement done with microelectrode arrays. For the task, an automatized and adaptive burst detection method is also utilized. Whereas the employed metrics are known from other applications, they are rarely employed in the assessment of burst in electrophysiological field potential measurements. Our results show that the proposed metrics are potential for the task at hand.

10.1109/embc.2015.7319450https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26737350