6533b7cffe1ef96bd125850f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The Politics of Utopia: Walter Pater’s “Lacedaemon”

subject

description

Walter Pater is not usually considered as a politically committed writer, neither is Aestheticism of which he was the gifted theoretician with The Renaissance (1873). Although the political commitments of the Aesthetic movement have been questioned over the last two decades, both by including women aesthetes, and by re-evaluating the movement’s dissemination among the middle classes, discussion of Pater’s political ideas is almost non-existent. His Plato and Platonism (1893) is however not so remote from politics since it discusses Plato’s political philosophy. In particular, “Lacedaemon”, the chapter devoted to Sparta, enables Pater to intervene in the political debate from an original standpoint. His political commitment appears as a meditation upon a specific form of citizenship, historically remote, and presented through a literary genre that was used for the first (and last) time in his writings—utopia, or rather dystopia, when it appears that the city-state is devoid of man’s essential characteristic: his paraleipomenon. Walter Pater n’est habituellement pas considéré comme un auteur engagé politiquement au regard de la place centrale qu’il occupe au sein du mouvement esthétique à travers The Renaissance (1873). Si l’Esthétisme a fait l’objet d’études récentes ayant montré son inscription dans le champ politique, Pater reste curieusement ignoré. Son Plato and Platonism (1893) qui traite en particulier de la République traite de philosophie politique. Le chapitre que Pater consacre à « Lacédémone » lui permet de surcroît de porter un regard oblique et original sur le champ politique de la fin de siècle victorienne. Méditant sur la citoyenneté spartiate à travers le genre inattendu sous sa plume de l’utopie / dystopie, Pater montre qu’elle s’appuie sur la négation d’une caractéristique individuelle essentielle à ses yeux : le paraleipomenon.