6533b7cffe1ef96bd12586da
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Guidelines for the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia
Chloé ArthuisPaul BerveillerFlorent FuchsLionel BouvetMax Gonzalez EstevezCatherine FischerMarie-pierre BonnetTiphaine Raia-barjatThomas SchmitzMarc GarnierVincent CompèreCéline CamilleriMarie-victoire SenatEdouard LecarpentierMarie BruyèreValentina FaitotAdeline CastelH. KeitaElodie ClouqueurA. RigouzzoJulien BureyLaurent ZieleskiewiczEmmanuel SimonAlexandre J VivantiMathias RossignolLoïc SentilhesFlorence VialAgnès Le Gouezsubject
medicine.medical_specialty[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]Neonatal morbidityMaternal morbidityGuidelinesCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinemedicineGrading (education)030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicineEclampsiabusiness.industryModerate levelGeneral MedicineEvidence-based medicinemedicine.diseaseSevere preeclampsia3. Good healthNeonatal morbidityQuality of evidence[SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio]Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineFamily medicineSevere pre-eclampsiabusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgeryMaternal morbiditydescription
Abstract Objective To provide national guidelines for the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia. Design A consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised. Methods The last SFAR and CNGOF guidelines on the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia were published in 2009. The literature is now sufficient for an update. The aim of this expert panel guidelines is to evaluate the impact of different aspects of the management of women with severe preeclampsia on maternal and neonatal morbidities separately. The experts studied questions within 7 domains. Each question was formulated according to the PICO (Patients Intervention Comparison Outcome) model and the evidence profiles were produced. An extensive literature review and recommendations were carried out and analysed according to the GRADE® methodology. Results The SFAR/CNGOF experts panel provided 25 recommendations: 8 have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/−), 9 have a moderate level of evidence (GRADE 2+/−), and for 7 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in expert opinions. No recommendation was provided for 3 questions. After one scoring round, strong agreement was reached between the experts for all the recommendations. Conclusions There was strong agreement among experts who made 25 recommendations to improve practices for the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2021-10-01 |