6533b7cffe1ef96bd1259712

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Intraspecific conflict over host manipulation between different larval stages of an acanthocephalan parasite

Elsa LégerThierry RigaudSébastien MotreuilMarie-jeanne Perrot-minnotLucile DianneAlexandre Bauer

subject

0106 biological sciences0303 health sciencesbiologyEcologyHost (biology)media_common.quotation_subjectIntermediate hostZoologymedicine.diseasebiology.organism_classification010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesCompetition (biology)Intraspecific competition03 medical and health sciencesGammarus pulexCoinfectionmedicineParasite hostingPomphorhynchus laevisEcology Evolution Behavior and Systematics030304 developmental biologymedia_common

description

Competitive interactions between coinfecting parasites are expected to be strong when they affect transmission success. When transmission is enhanced by altering host behaviour, intraspecific conflict can lead to ‘coinfection exclusion’ by the first-in parasite or to a ‘sabotage’ of behavioural manipulation by the youngest noninfective parasite. We tested these hypotheses in the acanthocephalan parasite Pomphorhynchus laevis, reversing phototaxis in its intermediate host Gammarus pulex. No evidence was found for coinfection exclusion in gammarids sequentially exposed to infection. Behavioural manipulation was slightly weakened but not cancelled in gammarids infected with mixed larval stages. Therefore, coinfecting infective and noninfective larvae both suffered competition, potentially resulting in delayed transmission and increased risk of mortality, respectively. Consequently, noninfective larva is not just a ‘passive passenger’ in the manipulated host, which raises interesting questions about the selective pressures at play and the mechanisms underlying manipulation.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02137.x