6533b7cffe1ef96bd12598aa
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Burden of Recurrent Hospitalizations Following an Admission for Acute Heart Failure: Preserved Versus Reduced Ejection Fraction.
Anna MollarJuan SanchisSergio García-blasJulio NúñezGema MiñanaErnesto ValeroEnrique SantasFrancisco J. ChorroEduardo NúñezPatricia Palausubject
Malemedicine.medical_specialtyanimal structures030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyPatient Readmission03 medical and health sciencesVentricular Dysfunction Left0302 clinical medicineCost of IllnessInterquartile rangeRecurrenceInternal medicinemedicineHumans030212 general & internal medicineAgedHeart FailureEjection fractionbusiness.industryStroke VolumeGeneral Medicinemedicine.diseaseConfidence intervalHospitalizationHeart failureAcute DiseaseCardiologyFemalebusinessHeart failure with preserved ejection fractiondescription
Abstract Introduction and objectives Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and reduced ejection fraction share a high mortality risk. However, differences in the rehospitalization burden over time between these 2 entities remains unclear. Methods We prospectively included 2013 consecutive patients discharged for acute heart failure. Of these, 1082 (53.7%) had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and 931 (46.2%) had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Cox and negative binomial regression methods were used to evaluate the risks of death and repeat hospitalizations, respectively. Results At a median follow-up of 2.36 years (interquartile range: 0.96-4.65), 1018 patients (50.6%) died, and 3804 readmissions were registered in 1406 patients (69.8%). Overall, there were no differences in mortality between heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (16.7 vs 16.1 per 100 person-years, respectively; P = 0794), or all-cause repeat hospitalization rates (62.1 vs 62.2 per 100 person-years, respectively; P = .944). After multivariable adjustment, and compared with patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction exhibited a similar risk of all-cause readmissions (incidence rate ratio = 1.04; 95%CI, 0.93-1.17; P = .461). Regarding specific causes, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction showed similar risks of cardiovascular and heart failure-related rehospitalizations (incidence rate ratio = 0.93; 95%CI, 0.82-1.06; P = .304; incidence rate ratio = 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.13; P = .677, respectively), but had a higher risk of noncardiovascular readmissions (incidence rate ratio = 1.24; 95%CI, 1.04-1.47; P = .012). Conclusions Following an admission for acute heart failure, patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction have a similar rehospitalization burden to those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction are more likely to be readmitted for noncardiovascular causes.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-01 | Revista espanola de cardiologia (English ed.) |