6533b7cffe1ef96bd1259aa9

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Precision of a commercial hartmann-shack aberrometer: limits of total wavefront laser vision correction.

Miguel J. MaldonadoMaría B. Coco-martínJuan C. NietoJesús Barrio-barrioAlberto López-miguelArnaldo Belzunce

subject

AdultMaleCorneal Wavefront AberrationIntraclass correlationZernike polynomialsmedicine.medical_treatmentRefraction Ocularsymbols.namesakeYoung AdultOpticsRefractive surgeryAberrometrymedicineHumansProspective StudiesMathematicsWavefrontObserver VariationReproducibilitybusiness.industryAberrometryReproducibility of ResultsRepeatabilityWavefront sensorMiddle AgedRefractive ErrorsOphthalmologysymbolsOptometryFemalebusiness

description

Purpose To assess the intrasession and intersession precision of higher-order aberrations (HOAs) measured using a commercial Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor (Zywave; Bausch & Lomb) in refractive surgery candidates. Design Prospective, experimental study of a device. Methods To analyze intrasession repeatability, 1 experienced examiner measured 30 healthy eyes 5 times successively. To study intersession reproducibility, the same clinician obtained measurements from another 30 eyes in 2 consecutive sessions at the same time of day 1 week apart. Results For intrasession repeatability, excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were obtained for total ocular aberrations, total HOAs, and second-order terms (ICC, > 0.94). The ICCs for third-order terms also were high (ICCs, > 0.87); however, fourth-order ICCs varied from 0.71 to 0.90 (Z 4 0 = 0.90); and fifth-order ICCs were less than 0.85. For intersession reproducibility, only total ocular aberrations, total ocular HOAs, second-order terms, Z 4 0 , Z 3 1 , and Z 3− 3 had ICCs of 0.90 or more. Bland-Altman analysis showed that the limits of agreement (were clinically too wide for most higher-order Zernike terms, especially for the third-order terms (> 0.21 μm). Conclusions Total ocular aberrations, total HOAs, and second-order terms can be measured reliably by Zywave aberrometry without anatomic recognition. Third-order terms and Z 4 0 are repeatable, but not as reproducible between visits. Fourth-order terms, except for Z 4 0 , and fifth-order terms are not sufficiently reliable for clinical decision making or treatment. Because the variability of Zywave can be a major limitation of a truly successful wavefront-guided excimer laser procedure, surgeons should consider treating HOA magnitudes that are more than the intrasession repeatability values (2.77 × S w ) as those presented in this study.

10.1016/j.ajo.2012.04.024https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22902046