6533b7d0fe1ef96bd125a5e2

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Llovet Josep MRicci SergioMazzaferro VincenzoHilgard PhilipGane EdwardBlanc Jean-frédéricDe Oliveira Andre CosmeArmando SantoroRaoul Jean-lucAlejandro FornerSchwartz MyronPorta CamilloZeuzem StefanBolondi LuigiGreten Tim FPeter R. GalleSeitz Jean-françoisBorbath IvanHäussinger DieterGiannaris TomShan MinghuaMoscovici MariusVoliotis DimitrisJordi BruixSchwartz M

subject

SorafenibMaleNiacinamidemedicine.medical_specialtyCarcinoma HepatocellularPyridinesPlaceboGastroenterologyDouble-Blind MethodInternal medicinemedicineCarcinomaHumansHEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAProtein Kinase InhibitorsAgedNeoplasm StagingProportional Hazards Modelsbusiness.industryPhenylurea CompoundsHazard ratioBenzenesulfonatesLiver NeoplasmsGeneral MedicineTREATMENTMiddle AgedSorafenibmedicine.diseaseInterim analysisSurvival AnalysisRecurrent Hepatocellular Carcinomadigestive system diseasesSurgeryHEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA; SORAFENIB; TREATMENTChemotherapy AdjuvantHepatocellular carcinomaDisease ProgressionFemaleraf KinasesbusinessLiver cancermedicine.drug

description

none 25 BACKGROUND: No effective systemic therapy exists for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. A preliminary study suggested that sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, the platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and Raf may be effective in hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: In this multicenter, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 602 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who had not received previous systemic treatment to receive either sorafenib (at a dose of 400 mg twice daily) or placebo. Primary outcomes were overall survival and the time to symptomatic progression. Secondary outcomes included the time to radiologic progression and safety. RESULTS: At the second planned interim analysis, 321 deaths had occurred, and the study was stopped. Median overall survival was 10.7 months in the sorafenib group and 7.9 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the sorafenib group, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.55 to 0.87; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the median time to symptomatic progression (4.1 months vs. 4.9 months, respectively, P=0.77). The median time to radiologic progression was 5.5 months in the sorafenib group and 2.8 months in the placebo group (P<0.001). Seven patients in the sorafenib group (2%) and two patients in the placebo group (1%) had a partial response; no patients had a complete response. Diarrhea, weight loss, hand-foot skin reaction, and hypophosphatemia were more frequent in the sorafenib group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, median survival and the time to radiologic progression were nearly 3 months longer for patients treated with sorafenib than for those given placebo. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00105443.) 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society 128. Llovet J.M.; Ricci S.; Mazzaferro V.; Hilgard P.; Gane E.; Blanc J.F.; de Oliveira A.C.; Santoro A.; Raoul J.L.; Forner A.; Schwartz M.; Porta C.; Zeuzem S.; Bolondi L.; Greten T.F.; Galle P.R.; Seitz J.F.; Borbath I.; Häussinger D.; Giannaris T.; Shan M.; Moscovici M.; Voliotis D.; Bruix J.; for the SHARP Investigators Study Group. 128. Llovet J.M.; Ricci S.; Mazzaferro V.; Hilgard P.; Gane E.; Blanc J.F.; de Oliveira A.C.; Santoro A.; Raoul J.L.; Forner A.; Schwartz M.; Porta C.; Zeuzem S.; Bolondi L.; Greten T.F.; Galle P.R.; Seitz J.F.; Borbath I.; Häussinger D.; Giannaris T.; Shan M.; Moscovici M.; Voliotis D.; Bruix J.; for the SHARP Investigators Study Group.

10.1056/nejmoa0708857http://hdl.handle.net/11585/62599