6533b7d0fe1ef96bd125b8fe
RESEARCH PRODUCT
The costs of social anxiety disorder: The role of symptom severity and comorbidities
Eric LeibingHans-helmut KönigBernhard StraussAlexander KonnopkaJoerg WiltinkStephan HerpertzManfred E. BeutelJuergen HoyerFalk LeichsenringNina StuhldreherSimone Salzersubject
AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyTotal costPopulationComorbidityEfficiencySeverity of Illness IndexYoung Adult03 medical and health sciencesIndirect costs0302 clinical medicineCost of IllnessAbsenteeismmental disordersHealth caremedicineHumans030212 general & internal medicineSocial BehaviorPsychiatryeducationhealth care economics and organizationseducation.field_of_studybusiness.industrySocial anxietyMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseAnxiety Disorders3. Good health030227 psychiatryPsychiatry and Mental healthClinical PsychologyEating disordersAbsenteeismAnxietyFemaleSelf Reportmedicine.symptomPsychologybusinessdescription
Abstract Background Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is associated with low direct costs compared to other anxiety disorders while indirect costs tend to be high. Mental comorbidities have been identified to increase costs, but the role of symptom severity is still vague. The objective of this study was to determine the costs of SAD, and to explore the impact of symptoms and comorbidities on direct and indirect costs. Methods Baseline data, collected within the SOPHO-NET multi-centre treatment study ( N =495), were used. Costs were calculated based on health care utilization and lost productivity. Symptom severity was measured with the Liebowitz-Social-Anxiety-Scale; comorbidities were included as covariates. Results Total 6-month costs were accrued to € 4802; 23% being direct costs. While there was no significant association with SAD symptom severity for direct costs, costs of absenteeism increased with symptom severity in those with costs >0; comorbid affective disorders and eating disorders had an additional effect. Self-rated productivity was lower with more pronounced symptoms even after controlling for comorbidities. Limitations As the study was based on a clinical sample total costs were considered, rather than net costs of SAD and no population costs could be calculated. Discussion The burden associated with lost productivity was considerable while costs of healthcare utilization were rather low as most patients had not sought for treatment before. Efforts to identify patients with SAD earlier and to provide adequate treatment should be further increased. Mental comorbidities should be addressed as well, since they account for a large part of indirect costs associated with SAD.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2013-10-28 | Journal of Affective Disorders |