6533b7d1fe1ef96bd125be21
RESEARCH PRODUCT
A proposito di D. 43.17.2 (Paul. 65 ad ed.)
Giacomo D'angelosubject
possessio iniustaPossessiopossessio iustaexceptio vitiosae possessioniinterdictum de viinterdictum uti possidetidescription
D. 43.17.2 (Paul. 65 ad ed.), in the opinion of Giovanni Nicosia, could be referred to the interdictum de vi rather than, as suggested by Otto Lenel, to the interdictum uti possidetis. According to the author, however, a careful examination of the source supports Lenel’s opinion
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-01 |